AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Irina Komarova

COS126 · STAT300 · MATH110 · MATH330 · MATH100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can attend consistently, monitor your grades, and handle disorganized but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardNice but disorganizedTest heavyPop quizzesGrading problemsAttendance matters
  • Students often call her nice, but , and lecture clarity.
  • Online evidence is very positive, while and much larger.
  • Getting a good grade seems possible, but students report , and real effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

High grades are possible, but students , and grade checking matter.

The single online review suggests a very high grade with effort, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The material and tests feel challenging because students describe , and .

Online evidence sounds manageable with support, but and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Reviews repeatedly say attendance was mandatory or warn students not to miss class.

Both online and also saying participation matters.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendations are split because some students find her helpful, while and .

Online evidence is strongly positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Some students earned high grades, but multiple in-person comments , and the need to track grades carefully.

Format shift

Online grading appears generous, while as risky or inaccurate.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students , and needing to work hard, so the workload is not light.

Format shift

Online workload is framed as manageable with effort, while and test-driven.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students often call her nice, but many say lectures are disorganized, unclear, or .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is excellent, but and more numerous.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Comments repeatedly mention tests, finals, quizzes, and pop quizzes as central to the course experience.

Format shift

Online assessment details are limited, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative, with , and grading errors.

Main concern

Students repeatedly , and grade tracking problems.

What students said

“ and difficult.”
MATH100
“Grades need to be corrected often so look out!”
MATH330
“her lectures are all over the place.”
MATH330

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive and says effort and .

Main concern

The evidence is only one review and still stresses not missing class.

What students said

“I received 114.26 % overall.”
COS126
“If you show up , shell do all she can to help you .”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with one optional final mention but and pop quizzes.

Long Difficult TestsPop QuizzesOptional Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

one course, and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

Long Difficult TestsPop QuizzesOptional Final Mentioned
“She give you 2 tests and .”
MATH100
“ and difficult.”
MATH100
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH100

Online

The online review does not .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good news is that and even funny sometimes. Bad news is her organization is horrendous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“her lectures are all over the place.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

43/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“Grades need to be corrected often so look out!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's nice professor and I liked her class
  • her organization is horrendous.
  • not so understandable in English

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and difficult.
  • I received 114.26 % overall.
  • Well you hav to work it off

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Always make sure she's entered your grades for HW and quizzes.
  • .
  • Grades need to be corrected often so look out!

Theme 4

📌

  • Be kind and dont miss a class.
  • Don't! Miss her class.
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are seven reviews with useful detail, but they are older and split sharply between one positive online review and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1002 reviews
MATH3302 reviews
COS1261 review
MATH1101 review
STAT3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values