AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Linda Vittitow

ANTHR310 · ANTH1 · ANTH301 · ANTH320 · LECTURE12529 · ANTHO300 · ANTH310 · ANTH300 · ANTH330 · ANTHROLAB · ANTHRO330 · ANTHR300 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if possible, but unless the course technology has clearly improved.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaringEasy AStudy guidesGreat lecturesOnline problems
  • and often describe an easy, caring class.
  • Online reviews are much weaker, mainly because of technology, organization, and communication problems.
  • because of study guides and note-card support, but online exam scheduling was criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Many in-person comments call the class an easy or automatic A, usually because and allow note cards.

, while online evidence shows A grades but warns about disorganization and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Most students describe the content as easy to follow, though a few say she teaches fast or .

In-person reviews make the course look easy, while online reviews make the experience harder because of delivery problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some reviews mark attendance mandatory or say attendance is taken, while .

Online evidence is mixed between optional and mandatory, and class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but the online reviews are strongly negative.

, while online reviews repeatedly advise against taking her online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly mention easy A outcomes, , study guides, note cards, and fair tests.

Format shift

, while online grades can still be high despite poor organization.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most comments describe manageable work, but one recent ANTH310 review reports lots of homework and test-heavy pacing.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually light, while online reviews focus more on late posting and poor organization than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

She is widely praised as caring and , but online teaching is criticized as disorganized and technologically weak.

Format shift

In-person teaching is often excellent, while online teaching is the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Many comments mention tests, midterms, finals, study guides, and note cards, with fewer assignment-heavy descriptions.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions exams, worksheets, assignments, and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews mostly describe her as , and easy to pass if students attend and follow the study guides.

Main concern

Some recent in-person reviews mention fast teaching, quiet lectures, or .

What students said

“Basically an automatic A”
ANTH310
“Super easy yet you will still learn a lot!”
ANTH300
“Study guides were given out for every test, and a 3x5 .”
ANTH320

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a kind professor but serious problems with technology, communication, late materials, and .

Main concern

Online organization and communication are the main risks.

What students said

“ .”
ANTH300
“No zoom lectures, horrible communicator.”
ANTH300
“Lectures and .”
ANTH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because of study guides and note cards, but online reviews report difficult exams and unstable test timing.

Study Guides3x5 Note CardOpen Book QuizzesScantron TestsOnline Exam Scheduling Problems

Assessment risk

Varies

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, note cards, and sometimes open-book quizzes, making exams generally student-friendly.

Study Guides3x5 Note CardOpen Book QuizzesScantron TestsFinal Not Cumulative
“Study guides were given out for every test, and a 3x5 .”
ANTH320
“ .”
ANTHRO330
“ .”
ANTH300

Online

Online reviews mention difficult exams and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Difficult ExamsChanged Test DatesFinal Scheduling Problems
“ ”
ANTH310
“Study Guide was post on the day of the .”
ANTH300
“She changed the dates of .”
ANTH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ . .”

📈 Easy A Signal

93/100

“Basically an automatic A, you can do whatever you want as long as your quite.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“No zoom lectures, horrible communicator.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is honestly one of the .
  • .
  • Professor Vittitow is a .
  • She makes the and reviews.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy to get a A in her class.
  • Basically an automatic A, you can do whatever you want as long as your quite.
  • Very easy instructor. I still learned a lot, though.
  • and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Format

  • .
  • No zoom lectures, horrible communicator.
  • Lectures and .
  • She changed the dates of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 42 reviews across many years with consistent in-person praise and a .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH30014 reviews
ANTH3106 reviews
ANTHR3106 reviews
ANTH3014 reviews
ANTH3203 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ANTHR3002 reviews
ANTHROLAB2 reviews
ANTH11 review
ANTH3301 review
ANTHO3001 review
ANTHRO3301 review
LECTURE125291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1