AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alaina Gibbons

STATS13383 · MATH25 · MATH32 · MATH372 · MA12376 · STAT12456 · MATH5 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want hands-on help and , and uneven test preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but strictLots of homeworkTough graderDisorganized coverageHelpful tutoring
  • Students split sharply between praising her support and criticizing organization.
  • , and .
  • Strong support can help motivated students, but the workload is not light.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Several students earned A-range grades, but comments show that , and persistence.

All grade and effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The math content is basic in some courses, but extra concepts, uneven coverage, and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Every review with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and patience, but many reject her because of , and organization.

The split recommendation pattern appears only in in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some reviews mention curves and dropped scores, but and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and assignments due near test days.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Her teaching is deeply mixed, with strong praise for patience and tutoring but repeated complaints about organization and coverage.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

68/100

Assessment appears to , and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring support and strong complaints about workload and organization.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“She spent much of her day tutoring us & helping us succeed.”
STATS13383
“ all.”
MATH32
“ and on exams that she either barely touched on or just flat out didn't cover at all.”
MATH372

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe hard tests and a final, with some partial credit and curves but .

Hard TestsFour ExamsFinal ExamPartial CreditCurved Grades

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, partial credit, curves, and dropped low scores.

Hard TestsFour ExamsFinal ExamPartial CreditCurved Grades
“ but she gives partial credit & curves up the .”
STAT12456
“4 exams, lots of homework, and a final..”
MATH5
“Little to no review for tests.”
MATH372

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives students all of her time & many opportunities to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She has patience & worked with me daily.”

⚖️

35/100

“ all.”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“4 exams, lots of homework, and a final..”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes an amazing teacher.
  • She spent much of her day tutoring us & helping us succeed.
  • She wasn't always prepared to answer questions and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but she gives partial credit & curves up the .
  • all.
  • and on exams that she either barely touched on or just flat out didn't cover at all.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • Great person, but and adds extra concepts that shouldn't be necessary for the class if it is not in the book!
  • She is a great person, but overall as a teacher, not so much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 detailed but older reviews show a consistent split between strong support and serious workload concerns.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH3722 reviews
MA123761 review
MATH251 review
MATH321 review
MATH51 review
Show 2 more courses
STAT124561 review
STATS133831 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1