AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julita Lambating

COS126 · MATH220 · MATH25 · MATH110 · MATH32 · MATH342 · TRIG · MATH370 · MATHMATH · MATH120 · MATH100 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her only if and , and self-study.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkGroup workHard to understandCaring but confusingEasy to pass
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising her patience and .
  • Many students say she makes mistakes, is hard to understand, or complicates math.
  • The class can be passable with attendance and work, but it is not a reliable easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Passing can be easy if students show up and do the work, but and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is not always advanced, but , and homework make it feel harder.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Recent as mandatory, and comments stress showing up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some students praise her patience and fairness, but many warn against taking her because .

All and is highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Reviews mention fair grading, , easy multiple choice tests, and grade errors that students need to check.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and the need to keep up with assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Although some students find her patient and understand, and makes mistakes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix , and multiple choice exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a polarizing math instructor who is often described as caring but , and group-work focused.

Main concern

Many students report , and difficulty understanding lectures.

What students said

“Expect to do a lot of homework.”
MATH120
“She has an accent that may be hard to understand and has a lot of mistakes and is very unspecific.”
MATH120
“But she is very easy to pass as long as you show up and do the work.”
100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention multiple choice tests and pop quizzes, but do not .

Multiple Choice TestsEasy TestsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in some sections, and pop quizzes in one course.

Multiple Choice TestsEasy TestsPop Quizzes
“ and very easy!”
MATH120
“If ,and fast paced environment then this is the professor for you.”
MATH342
“The , but not easy also.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and definitly cares about her students though. Expect to do a lot of homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person reviews, highlighting , and clarity concerns; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She has an accent that may be hard to understand and has a lot of mistakes and is very unspecific.”

📚 Workload Pressure

35/100

“Expect to do a lot of homework.”

⚖️

62/100

“She is a and homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easygoing character.
  • She teaches step by step and is fair.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • But she is very easy to pass as long as you show up and do the work.
  • and very easy!
  • Coulda got an A but I didnt do hw!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Main Concerns

  • The students always have to correct the examples on the board.
  • Very hard to understand.
  • I didnt understand her at all & i felt like her method of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 26 in-person reviews across many years and courses, but older reviews and polarized experiences reduce certainty.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH12010 reviews
MATH253 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH322 reviews
MATH3422 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1001 review
COS1261 review
MATH1001 review
MATH2201 review
MATH3701 review
MATHMATH1 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values