AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jayne Overgard

MATH400 · MATH25 · MATH110 · MATH330 · MATH32 · MATH · MATH10 · MATH125 · MA120 · MATH410 · MATH120 · MATH310GMTRY · MATH100 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
52.94%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Choose her for lower-level math if you will attend and do the work, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkMandatory attendanceFair gradingMixed teaching qualityBetter for lower math
  • Students repeatedly report heavy MyMathLab homework and .
  • Lower-level math students often praise her support, while higher-level .
  • Grades can be fair or lenient through reviews, partial credit, , and dropped scores, but the workload is real.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Getting a good grade is realistic because reviews mention fair grading, , partial credit, and , but it takes steady work.

The online review gives little grade detail, while but grade-rewarding patterns.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Lower-level courses can feel manageable, but higher math reviews describe and difficult concepts.

Online , while in-person evidence shows large course-level variation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Many reviews say attendance, participation, roll, or .

The online review marks attendance mandatory, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

and help, but many warn against her for upper-level math or .

The single online review is positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention fair grading, partial credit, , dropped lower scores, and .

Format shift

Leniency evidence is mainly from in-person reviews, while the online .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, online quizzes, MyMathLab, and double-digit weekly hours.

Format shift

Heavy workload is strongly supported by in-person reviews, while .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is praised as caring and helpful in lower math, but criticized for and .

Format shift

The online review is positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear , and reviews rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

, and online evidence is too limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lower math support and strong criticism for upper-level lecture clarity.

Main concern

Attendance and , and .

What students said

“ if you have struggled with math all your life like I did.”
MATH100
“I had to use private tutors and youtube to learn linear algebra.”
MATH410
“there is a TON of hours per week on it.”
MATH400

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only online review is positive and , but it .

Main concern

Online evidence is too thin to judge policies or workload well.

What students said

“ and she is very good at what she teaches”
MATH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard math testing with helpful reviews, partial credit, and some MyMathLab-based assessments.

Exam Reviews Similar To TestsMyMathLab TestsOnline QuizzesIn-Class Midterm And FinalPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, quizzes, midterms, finals, MyMathLab-generated tests, similar reviews, and partial credit, but .

Exam Reviews Similar To TestsMyMathLab TestsOnline QuizzesIn-Class Midterm And FinalPartial Credit
“ surprisingly similar to the actual test.”
MATH120
“4 tests throughout the semester and the .”
MATH110
“all the .”
MATH125

Online

The single online review does not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have struggled with math all your life like I did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and course-fit themes; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She has a gift and a passion for teaching lower division students.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“there is a TON of hours per week on it.”

⚖️

72/100

“She tries really hard to give people who are struggling a chance to pass.”

⚠️ Course Fit

57/100

“ as a last resort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a gift and a passion for teaching lower division students.
  • She reads out of the book word for word and when we asked her to word things differently she said she couldn't.
  • Her examples were easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to work to earn the grade.
  • She grades on attempt and so .
  • if you write anything remotely true and connected to the problem.

Theme 3

📚

  • She uses Pearson MyMathLab, so expect piles of homework.
  • She takes roll every day so skippers beware.
  • If because I can read myself too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 33 reviews across many courses and years, with , and course-level variation.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH256 reviews
MATH4106 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
MATH1103 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH3303 reviews
MATH322 reviews
MATH4002 reviews
MA1201 review
MATH1 review
MATH101 review
MATH1201 review
MATH310GMTRY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Pass 1