AI Rate Professor

Legal Assisting

Jessie Morris

LA334 · LA342 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you mainly need the grade and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganized lecturesUnclear expectationsLow preparationLenient gradingOne strong defender
  • Most comments describe unclear, off-topic, poorly prepared lectures.
  • Grades appear easy, but the learning experience is weak and inconsistent.
  • One positive review praises his courtroom experience, but it is outweighed by repeated negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Reported grades are mostly A or A+, and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course does not sound intellectually hard, but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory once and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Three of four reviews say not to take him because .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

High reported grades and .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

but do not describe a heavy workload.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most , and weak organization.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews mention assignments and , but .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with and poor organization despite easy grades.

Main concern

The main risk is poor structure and low teaching value.

What students said

“The .”
LA334
“You never know what's due or .”
LA334
“ ”
LA342

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor never gave a syllabus and as he goes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He was not prepare for class lectures, and he liked to go off topics.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“ ”

⚖️

75/100

“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • His lectures are off topic and boring.
  • and does not care about the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • A
  • A+
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS

Theme 3

✅ Positive Minority View

  • Great professor, nice guy, and always willing to give you his time.
  • I have taken his Criminal Law and Evidence class and learned more about Law from him, then any other professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but the negative comments are detailed and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

LA3342 reviews
LA3422 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values