AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

James Curry

MATH110 · MATH330 · MATH370 · MATH100 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and comfortable teaching yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching riskPoor recommendationSome helpful outliers
  • Most students describe his teaching as , and .
  • Several reviews say students had to learn from the textbook or online resources instead of class.
  • A few positive reviews praise his availability, but they are outweighed by strong negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A good grade depends heavily on prior math strength and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say the material becomes harder because , and homework may cover content not taught well.

Only in-person reviews exist, and most .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory, but many do not clearly state an .

and is inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking him because they found the and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grades are hard to judge, but , and withdrawal reports make the grading experience feel unforgiving.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and time spent learning outside class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

The dominant pattern is , unclear notes, skipped steps, and students correcting him in class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention lots of homework and general class difficulty, but do not give a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments, and details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is from in-person classes, and a .

Main concern

Students weak in math may struggle because lectures and .

What students said

“Prof. is smart BUT .”
MATH330
“I learned 95% of this subject from online myself.”
330
“THE !!!!”
MATH370

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I learned 95% of this subject from online myself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in teaching clarity, workload, and self-teaching risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Prof. is smart BUT .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ !!!”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

25/100

“I learned 95% of this subject from online myself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is often (if not constantly) corrected by students.
  • He skips steps, some which you know, some you don't.
  • Curry knows Math well but .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Gives LOTS of hw that he doesn't cover in class and .
  • He also gives out a lot of however it is basic algebra.
  • and does not teach according to the loose leaf textbook you spent lots of money for.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • if you are a math wiz.
  • if you are bad at math.
  • If you are excellent at trig and just need to pass, this is the class for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 13 in-person reviews with consistent negative teaching themes, but several reviews are old and some are brief.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH3703 reviews
3302 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
MATH3302 reviews
118631 review
Show 3 more courses
3701 review
MATH 3701 review
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1