AI Rate Professor

History

Michelle Arce

USHISTB · HISTAA · HCD · HISTORY · HIST18 · USHIS2985 · HISTSECT · HISTORY18 · HISOTRY311 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with , and mixed communication risk.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized reviewsReading-heavy workloadParticipation mattersCommunication concernsMixed grading experience
  • Recent online reviews are mixed, with two positive reviews and one severe complaint about communication.
  • and polarized, ranging from compassionate and effective to strongly negative.
  • The course seems reading- and participation-driven, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Passing looks possible with , and participation, but and a D review prevent calling it easy.

Online evidence shows reasonable work but also a D; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content appears moderate, with reading, participation, and some compressed summer pacing rather than extreme difficulty.

Online reviews emphasize reading and weekly assignments, while , and summer cramming.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory in some reviews and optional in others.

and , while the main recent in-person review marks attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Some students recommend her, but communication complaints and older harsh reviews make the experience risky.

Online reviews are split, while and more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One online review calls her reasonable, but and one student received a D.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is mixed; but and attendance help.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students should expect , and one to two assignments per week in online evidence.

Format shift

Online reviews give .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Reviews are sharply split between compassionate and knowledgeable praise and severe criticism about communication and subject command.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is recent and mixed, while and polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention reading, homework, participation, assignments, and pop quizzes, but do not show a .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions pop quizzes and weekly assignments; and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and highly polarized, with both strong praise and harsh criticism of knowledge and connection with class.

Main concern

and classroom connection.

What students said

“Very good Teacher.”
HIST18
“She is completly disconnected from her class.”
HISOTRY311
“very effective educator”
HISTSECT

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with reasonable workload and but serious communication concerns in another.

Main concern

One online student says she does not communicate or care if students fail.

What students said

“This professor is a and gives out reasonable work.”
HCD
“does not communicate at all and does not care if you fail”
HIST18
“Good professor, will attend another class.”
HISTORY18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes, but they do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes, but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Beware of pop quizzes”
HISTORY18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“does not communicate at all and does not care if you fail”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and communication risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Very good Teacher.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

48/100

“does not communicate at all and does not care if you fail”

📚 Workload Pattern

45/100

“Get ready to read for most of the part, 1-2 assignment every week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good Teacher.
  • very effective educator
  • She is completly disconnected from her class.
  • Ignorant, has no knowledge of what she's teaching.

Theme 2

📚

  • Get ready to read for most of the part, 1-2 assignment every week.
  • As long as and show up every day you will pass.
  • She was very flexible and had great knowledge of the subject matter.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • does not communicate at all and does not care if you fail
  • Not good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews include three recent online reviews, but , and polarized.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HIST185 reviews
HISTORY182 reviews
HCD1 review
HISOTRY3111 review
HISTAA1 review
Show 4 more courses
HISTORY1 review
HISTSECT1 review
USHIS29851 review
USHISTB1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1