AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Carren Christensen

ANTH301 · ANTHRO301SCC · ANTHLAB · ANTHRO301 · ANTH300 · ANTHOLAB · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if you want a , but expect attendance and some reports or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring teacherEasy testsMixed workloadStrict reports
  • Students often praise her clarity, examples, and caring attitude.
  • Tests are usually manageable when students follow lectures and study guides.
  • A few lab and writing-heavy reviews report excess work, boredom, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A looks realistic if students attend, use notes and study guides, and handle the reports carefully.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Most students describe the , and tests as straightforward, though .

All course and lab reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Several reviews mark attendance as mandatory or and notes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and caring teaching, but a minority report boredom, strictness, and unclear answers.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tests and , but zoo reports, papers, and some chapter work are graded more strictly.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but , and study preparation can add up.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and interesting, while several older reviews describe her as boring or unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is fully in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, homework, study guides, reports, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but lean positive, with and exams fair.

Main concern

Some students found the lab workload and reports heavier or stricter than expected.

What students said

“Whoa! Finally a professor that makes it all make sense!”
ANTH301
“The .”
ANTH301
“ AND REQUIRES MORE TIME AND WORK THAN THE LECTURE CLASS.”
ANTH301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

as straightforward, lecture-aligned, and helped by study guides or a note card.

Straightforward TestsStudy Guide Aligned3x5 Note Card Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book or .

Straightforward TestsStudy Guide Aligned3x5 Note Card Allowed
“the .”
ANTH301
“ use a 3x5 card for test days”
ANTHOLAB
“ .”
ANTH301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Whoa! Finally a professor that makes it all make sense!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and exam patterns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is very good at coming up with examples right off of hand when explaining new topics.”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“follow the study guide and u will do fine.”

⚖️ Workload Risk

55/100

“For being a 1 unit class it requires more work than necessary.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is also funny and very helpful.
  • Class was well taught and very interesting.
  • PROFESSOR IS BORING AND STRICT.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .
  • .
  • She grades a bit hard on the zoo report though so beware.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • .
  • use a 3x5 card for test days
  • People who didn't make a note-card (spelling counts!) for the as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews give usable detail across years, but many are old and some recommendation data is missing.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH3017 reviews
ANTHRO3012 reviews
ANTH3001 review
ANTHLAB1 review
ANTHOLAB1 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHRO301SCC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values