AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Linda Hoang

MATH125 · MATH100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate poor communication and inconsistent class coverage.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMisses ClassesPoor CommunicationRushed LecturesAvoid RecommendedUnclear Teaching
  • Both reviews are strongly negative and say she misses many classes without notice.
  • Students report weak communication, unanswered emails, rushed lectures, and skipped material.
  • The course itself may not be the hardest, but the teaching experience appears very poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The course is not described as the toughest, but poor teaching and skipped material make earning an A uncertain and self-driven.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Students say the course is not the toughest, but rushed lectures and skipped chapters make the learning experience harder.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, but reviews focus more on the professor missing class than student flexibility.

and entirely in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both students say because of missed classes, poor communication, and rushed teaching.

Recommendation evidence is entirely negative and entirely in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

but do not clearly prove harsh or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews , but skipped coverage may push more learning work onto students.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students report missed classes, unanswered emails, skipped chapters, rushed lectures, and difficulty understanding her.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments and course material but do not clearly .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

classes, poor communication, skipped material, and rushed lectures.

Main concern

because lectures are rushed and coverage is inconsistent.

What students said

“ lot of classes.”
MATH125
“She missed so many days of class and .”
MATH100
“ .”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible, terrible professor. lot of classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in reliability, communication, and teaching quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ .”

👎 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Rushes through lectures and is very hard to understand.”

📉 Reliability

20/100

“She missed so many days of class and .”

Theme 1

🚫 About Reliability

  • lot of classes.
  • She missed so many days of class and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rushes through lectures and is very hard to understand.
  • Skipped so many chapters and sections from the material she was supposed to cover.
  • Horrible accent and speeds through lecture.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Advice

  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent to each other and strongly consistent in their complaints.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1001 review
MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values