AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

I Peters

MATH400 · MATH25 · MATH330 · MATH32 · MATH342 · MATH370 · MATHALGR · MATH0100 · MATH125 · MATH202 · MATHH100 · MATH100 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable self-teaching math and using or study guides to offset weak instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing teachingSelf-learning requiredDisorganized classesHard testsSome extra credit
  • Most negative comments say students must self-teach because .
  • Some lower-level or summer students found her kind, helpful, and grade-friendly.
  • The biggest risk is a , and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, study guides, dropped exams, and , but many students say hard tests and self-teaching still make the A costly.

The online review mentions and a , while in-person reviews are split between easy grade support and very hard exams.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Lower-level math can feel easy, but unclear explanations, fast pacing, and .

The one online review says the class is not bad for self-learners, while harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory or say students lose points for missing class, and .

; the online review does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking her because they find the , and not aligned with exams.

The unless self-learning, while in-person reviews contain many stronger warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

She offers , and sometimes a , but hard tests and point penalties keep grading from feeling generous overall.

Format shift

The online review supports and a , while in-person reviews show both grade help and harsh exam experiences.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of homework, heavy self-study, tutoring, and .

Format shift

The online review emphasizes self-learning, while , and exam-preparation complaints.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

A , but repeated comments describe unclear explanations, disorganization, mistakes, and .

Format shift

The online , and most in-person reviews repeat similar teaching concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Comments repeatedly mention exams, , and Mathlab, with exams carrying the main risk.

Format shift

The online review mentions a , while in-person reviews repeatedly focus on hard or mismatched tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative, with repeated complaints about , and needing outside help.

Main concern

Students often say lectures do not prepare them for exams.

What students said

“ .”
MATH370
“Don't do it, turn around, your making a big mistake.”
MATH100
“she gives study guides which is .”
MATH342

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the class is passable with and a , but only for self-learners.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Must be self-learner in order to pass this class because .”
MATH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some students say study guides match exams, but .

Hard TestsStudy Guides Similar To ExamsDropped Lowest ExamMini Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam-prep problems, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, or closed-book policy.

Hard TestsStudy Guides Similar To ExamsMini Quizzes
“she gives study guides which is .”
MATH342
“the we practice.”
MATH370
“always have a ”
MATH400

Online

The online review only clearly proves and a ; it does not prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, or quiz format.

Dropped Lowest ExamExtra Credit
“offers extra-credit and ”
MATH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Must be self-learner in order to pass this class because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

30/100

“Don't do it, turn around, your making a big mistake.”

📈 Grade Support

58/100

“Offers .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She often misunderstands question and while you try and correct your question.
  • , and she had a .
  • She seems smart but .

Theme 2

📈 About Exams And Grades

  • she gives study guides which is .
  • She'll only .
  • the we practice.
  • offers extra-credit and

Theme 3

🧭 About Who Can Survive

  • You must be a self learner to pass her class
  • if your not a self learner
  • I had to get a tutor so I can pass this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews across many years provide rich evidence, though the data is old and opinions vary by course level.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH1007 reviews
MATH254 reviews
MATH3424 reviews
MATH323 reviews
MATH3303 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1252 reviews
MATH3702 reviews
MATH4002 reviews
MATHH1002 reviews
MATH01001 review
MATH2021 review
MATHALGR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values