AI Rate Professor

History

Maria Cambell

HIST330 · HISTO310 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want an engaging history class with manageable difficulty, but expect some inconsistency in lecture focus.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging TeachingGPA FriendlyInteresting ClassSometimes Off TopicMixed Care Feedback
  • Most students describe her class as interesting and .
  • The course seems manageable if students keep up with homework.
  • One review raises concerns about off-topic lectures and limited care for students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students suggest the class can help GPA if , but there is not enough grade evidence to call it effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course sounds accessible and interesting, with moderate difficulty ratings and no comments about complex content.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

because the class is engaging, though one review is sharply negative.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

The GPA-friendly comment suggests lenient outcomes, but there is no grade .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

as the main requirement, and no student describes the workload as heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Three reviews praise her teaching and class experience, while one review criticizes her focus and care.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

One review mentions tests and papers, but the assessment mix is not described clearly enough for a strong conclusion.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it gives limited assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

negative review about focus and grading ownership.

Main concern

Lecture focus can drift, and one student felt unsupported.

What students said

“Teaching style is amazing! Great class!”
HIST330
“ if you need to improve your GPA.”
HISTO310
“ and papers, never really stays on topic during lectures.”
HIST330

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and papers but do not clearly .

Tests MentionedPapers MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers, but they do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedPapers MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ and papers, never really stays on topic during lectures.”
HIST330

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Was a really good teacher. She has definately opened my eyes to a whole new world and changed my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Teaching style is amazing! Great class!”

👍 Recommendation Strength

80/100

“I recomend her to any one guy or girl.”

⚖️

70/100

“ if you need to improve your GPA.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaching style is amazing! Great class!
  • Her classes are so interesting.
  • Was a really good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This teacher is really nice and not really hard as .
  • if you need to improve your GPA.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She does get a little off topic sometimes but usually covers what we need.
  • and papers, never really stays on topic during lectures.
  • Doesn't care about her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are four detailed but and one strong negative outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST3303 reviews
HISTO3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values