AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

James Eckerman

STAT1 · MATH401 · MATH370 · MATH · MATH402 · ALGEBRA · CALC2 · MATH120 · INVMATHMATICS · STAT301 · MATH100 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid him unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredHeavy HomeworkConfusing LecturesHard ExamsNice But Ineffective
  • Many students say they had to teach themselves because .
  • Workload is repeatedly described as heavy, especially homework-heavy math courses.
  • Some students mention curves and helpfulness, but the overall recommendation signal is poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Curves and help some students, but , and self-teaching make an A costly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The math content is not always described as inherently impossible, but .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are no online reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most negative reviews warn that , and hard exams make the class a bad choice.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

and gives partial credit, but students still describe him as unforgiving and hard to pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Multiple students , and weekly pressure beyond what class covers.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often call him nice, but many .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and exams, with tests often carrying major stress.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently , and difficult or confusing exams.

Main concern

Students often feel they must learn the material on their own.

What students said

“You will end up teaching yourself.”
MATH100
“He assigns an INSANE amount of HW, about 250-300 problems a week.”
MATH370
“ and .”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as , and sometimes memorization-heavy, with limited student-friendly support.

Long TestsConfusing TestsMemorizationOne Page Of NotesCurved Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

allowed page of notes in one class, and curves, but no proctoring or open-book policy is clearly proven.

Long TestsConfusing TestsOne Page Of NotesCurved Exams
“ and .”
STAT1
“ and lets you use a page of notes.”
STAT301
“ finish in time limit.”
MATH370

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will end up teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Good guy, but not a good professor.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“He assigns an INSANE amount of HW, about 250-300 problems a week.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ . at all cost.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You will end up teaching yourself.
  • Lectures tend to be a bit tough to follow, so .
  • bad teacher, he tends to get a lot of the problems wrong himself while hes trying to teach

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • will not budge on the overwellming amount of .
  • He assigns an INSANE amount of HW, about 250-300 problems a week.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • and .
  • Quizzes and as long as .
  • finish in time limit.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

There are 24 reviews with repeated detailed themes, but the evidence is old and includes a few vague or unserious comments.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1007 reviews
MATH3705 reviews
4012 reviews
STAT3012 reviews
ALGEBRA1 review
Show 7 more courses
CALC21 review
INVMATHMATICS1 review
MATH1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH4011 review
MATH4021 review
STAT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values