AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maria Wong

MATH1235 · MATHMATH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the material and do .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ExplanationsNice PersonalityPoor TeachingNot Beginner FriendlyClassroom Friction
  • All three reviews .
  • Students say she is nice, but that does not offset the teaching problems.
  • The course appears especially risky for students who already struggle with math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

No grade evidence supports an easy A, and succeed.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math itself is made harder because students say and incomplete.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One review says she reacts badly when a student tries to use class time for other work, suggesting low flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students consistently because she cannot teach the material clearly.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but poor instruction likely makes grades harder to earn.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews focus on poor explanations rather than heavy or light workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Every substantive review says she is confusing, ineffective, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and consistently describe confusing teaching despite a .

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“She is a terrible teacher.”
201232
“Nice professor, but she clearly has forgotten how to teach Math.”
MATHMATH
“ .”
MATH1235

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice professor, but she clearly has forgotten how to teach Math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting repeated concerns about teaching clarity and course fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ ”

📚 Course Challenge

28/100

“If math isn't one of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a terrible teacher.
  • Nice professor, but she clearly has forgotten how to teach Math.
  • She , and she only teaches what the book says.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Fit

  • If math isn't one of .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's nice and all, but cannot teach or answer a simple question.
  • but thats about it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, but they are consistent and specific about the same teaching problem.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2012321 review
MATH12351 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values