AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cheryl Sershen

STATS301 · MATH370 · STATS · MATH125 · MATH120 · MATH335 · MATH2057 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared teachingConfusing explanationsHeavy homeworkStrict or unreliable gradingNot recommended
  • Most reviews say she is unprepared, confusing, or weak on the subject matter.
  • Some students found her nice and helpful, but those positives are outweighed by repeated teaching concerns.
  • Workload and because comments mention lots of , and test mismatch.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

helps in some classes, but repeated , and no late work keep the A far from easy.

; there is no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content becomes harder because students say and the professor often cannot solve problems.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but several comments imply regular class participation and daily work matter.

All evidence is in person, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and unreliable test support.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Some exists, but students report , and no late work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework, daily class work, labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments say she is unprepared, boring, unable to explain, or weak in the subject matter.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to , and a final.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about preparation, subject knowledge, workload, and tests.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she cannot explain or solve course material reliably.

What students said

“Very unprepared.”
MATH335
“Doesn't know what she is teaching.”
MATH125
“ !”
MATH370
“Cant prove theorems or ,and tests on the things she cant teach.”
MATH370

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests match reviews and others saying they do not.

Test Reviews Sometimes Match TestsTest Reviews Sometimes Do Not Match TestsOne Page of Notes AllowedTwo Pages of Notes Allowed for FinalQuiz Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and allowed notes, but do not prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Test Reviews Sometimes Match TestsTest Reviews Sometimes Do Not Match TestsOne Page of Notes AllowedTwo Pages of Notes Allowed for FinalQuiz Mentioned
“The and she gives so much hw and , it pretty much takes the place of an exam.”
MATH125
“ on the tests.”
MATH335
“2 exams and . allows you to have one page of notes for the exam and two pages of notes for final.”
STATS301
“she gave 5 sections of homework and a !! no late work accepted.”
MATH370

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Doesnt understand the subject matter, rewrites what is in the book on the board to teach it.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“Teacher doesn't seem to have a grasp on the subject in which she is teaching. She is fairly boring, not reccomended.”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

22/100

“The homeowrk is really time consuming but simple.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very unprepared.
  • She is very boring. Doesn't know what she is teaching.
  • Cant prove theorems or ,and tests on the things she cant teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • on the tests.
  • If you come to class and do the .
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • she give everyday class work
  • The homeowrk is really time consuming but simple.
  • she gave 5 sections of homework and a !! no late work accepted.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • She is such a nice person.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews are detailed and consistent, but they are old and emotionally uneven.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH3703 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH20571 review
MATH3351 review
Show 2 more courses
STATS1 review
STATS3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values