AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Louis Schubert

ADMJ67 · POL12 · POLS22 · POLISCI5 · POLISCI · GOVERNMENT · JS110 · POLS5 · POLSC5 · POLS45 · POLS3 · POLS1 · POL1 · POLI3 · 227 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
80.52%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a challenging, lecture-centered political science class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent LecturerLecture HeavyExam FocusedCaring When ContactedPolitically Polarizing
  • Students strongly praise his knowledge, humor, and lecture quality.
  • Grades depend heavily on lectures, notes, readings, and .
  • Some students find exams hard, lectures dense, or his political framing biased and frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades are realistic with strong notes, reading, and , but this is not a low-effort A.

Both formats require lecture notes and can be long and easy to fall behind on.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is intellectually dense, especially in theory and international relations, but .

Online reviews describe dense lectures and , while but stronger classroom engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

43/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say lectures and notes are essential for exams.

In-person reviews stress attending class, while online reviews stress watching lectures and staying current.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him because his lectures are engaging, knowledgeable, and memorable, even when the class is demanding.

, though online has a few stronger complaints about clarity, workload, and lecture length.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is generally fair and flexible when students communicate, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention leniency with personal issues, while and few graded components.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The workload is not always constant homework, but , and exams require steady effort.

Format shift

Online reviews call the class lecture-heavy and reading-heavy, while , and .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students widely describe him as brilliant, funny, caring, and engaging, but some object to bias, sarcasm, or dense lectures.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the strongest praise for live lectures, while but mention length and focus issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and a few major assignments.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-centered, with online reviews also mentioning quizzes and submitted reading questions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and care, with repeated warnings that exams rely on thorough notes and attendance.

Main concern

Missing lectures or .

What students said

“if .”
POL1
“The .”
POLS5

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews praise engaging recorded lectures and flexibility, but warn that the , and exam-focused.

Main concern

Online students can fall behind if they do not watch long lectures, read, and .

What students said

“His online course is pretty lecture and notes-heavy but he is anything but boring and also very funny.”
POLS5
“SUPER HARD class for an intro-level class at a community college.”
POLI3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard to demanding and rely heavily on lecture notes and open-book policies.

Exam HeavyLecture-Based ExamsWritten Exam SectionsLong ExamsReading-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly say , and may include written sections.

Lecture-Based ExamsWritten PartsTest HeavyFew Graded Items
“Your grade is based on the and written parts) and a final 8-10 page report”
ADMJ67
“The grade is .”
POL1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and long or , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, or open-book rules.

QuizzesLong ExamsChallenging ExamsLecture Notes Required
“quizzes and .”
POLS1
“ but aside from that solid class.”
POLS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're an auditory learner or prefer to learn by lecture Professor Schubert is as good as it gets.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Lou Schuberts lectures were masterfully informative, insightful, and completely captivating.”

🧪

48/100

“The grade is .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • Super engaging lectures.
  • His lectures are the epitome of amazing.
  • The lectures can be dense and the , but it is more than made up for by being very interesting

Theme 2

📚

  • and exams based mostly on lectures, so .
  • Get ready to read a if your looking for an easy A.
  • Exams are straightforward without surprises if and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • Professor presents subjective political opinions as objective facts
  • If you miss a .
  • Tough teacher with high expectations but so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

227

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 detailed reviews across many years and course levels, with , and recommendation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5159
4 out of 533
3 out of 516
2 out of 510
1 out of 510

Course coverage

POL118 reviews
POLS57 reviews
POLS16 reviews
POLI35 reviews
POLS33 reviews
Show 9 more courses
POLS222 reviews
POLS452 reviews
ADMJ671 review
GOVERNMENT1 review
JS1101 review
POL121 review
POLISCI1 review
POLISCI51 review
POLSC51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 3 · A 20

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 6