AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Michael Estrada

POLY5 · POLSCI1 · POL101 · POLYSCI5 · POLI1 · POSCI101 · POLISCI1 · POLSCI · POLS4 · POLYS1 · POLISCIENCE1 · POLS1 · POL1 · 140 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a manageable political science class and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStraightforward assignmentsDiscussion heavyPolitical bias concernsManageable workloadRambles off topic
  • Most students describe the class as manageable if they read, attend, and complete short writing or discussion work.
  • Teaching is polarizing because many like his examples and discussions while others dislike rambling or political bias.
  • Grades are often good, but some students , and little .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earned A grades and call the work easy, but , and .

Online and in-person evidence both support manageable grades, though online includes one report of .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is usually described as introductory and straightforward, though .

as a GE-friendly course, while online reviews focus more on organization and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is sometimes described as mandatory or important, while some lectures .

Online evidence , and in-person evidence often says skipping hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and discussion, but political bias and off-topic lectures create real hesitation.

In-person reviews are broader and more positive overall, while online reviews are fewer and more split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are often high and , but several students mention fuzzy grading, few grading items, or no .

Format shift

In-person grading is usually described as manageable, while online includes a .

Workload

Light

72/100

Work usually consists of readings, quizzes, discussions, short essays, and group .

Format shift

Both formats describe regular reading and overall workload easy.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is often seen as knowledgeable, caring, and engaging, but criticism centers on rambling, bias, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching feedback is mixed but mostly positive, while and insightful to very negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, discussions, writing, participation, group work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and discussions, while , and participation more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews say the course is usually easy or manageable, but lectures can ramble and .

Main concern

The main risk is frustration with rambling, participation pressure, or political tone.

What students said

“Basic fundamentals course, no prior experience with politics necessary.”
POLS1
“This class was so insanely boring, and he's so weirdly aggressive to get participation out of his students.”
POL1

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with and but one harsh review calling the lectures poorly prepared.

Main concern

Online students disagree sharply on whether his lectures are engaging or unfocused.

What students said

“His online class was very organized and he and .”
POL1
“ . Uninformed, offensive, rants off-topic.”
POL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser rules.

QuizzesMidterm and final mentionedTests based on lectures and readings

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Midterm and finalLecture-based testsReading-based quizzes
“ .”
POL1
“ and understand them, because .”
POLS1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and Canvas discussions, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Online quizzesCanvas discussions
“The , but Unstuck study helped me prep.”
POLS1
“If you miss a deadline for a as long as you contact him.”
POLS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is entirely manageable, as long as you put in effort. Don't be lazy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He goes into detail and gives great examples to help you remember, but also tends to ramble.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Value

78/100

“You will get an A rather easily if you do this.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He frequently shows videos of real-world events related to the lessons.
  • Lectures are straight forward.
  • he sometimes goes off topic but always catches himself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is entirely manageable, as long as you put in effort.
  • His class is easy. Your grade as long as you pay attention in class.
  • No matter how hard you work on the discussions, he will always find the way .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • Some class topics may irritate some who can't regulate their emotions well.
  • If you're a .
  • Great class for liberals to feed into their owns stuff, anyone else you are in for so frustrating moments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

140

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews across many years with detailed and consistent themes, though older reviews reduce precision slightly.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 552
4 out of 537
3 out of 529
2 out of 515
1 out of 57

Course coverage

POL119 reviews
POLS119 reviews
POLISCIENCE12 reviews
POL1011 review
POLI11 review
Show 8 more courses
POLISCI11 review
POLS41 review
POLSCI1 review
POLSCI11 review
POLY51 review
POLYS11 review
POLYSCI51 review
POSCI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 7 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1