AI Rate Professor

Business

Clayton Viertel

ACCT54 · ACCT1 · ACCT57 · ACCT2 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want to learn accounting seriously and will attend, study, and prepare for exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear but demandingTest heavyAccounting expertiseAttendance helpsMixed student support
  • Most in-person students say he is knowledgeable, funny, and clear, but the class requires serious study.
  • , and students who skip class or .
  • The single online review is strongly negative and reports poor help, while but demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and strong exam performance.

Online evidence gives no easy-A support, while but not cheaply.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Accounting content is repeatedly described as hard, conceptual, and serious even when his lectures help.

The online review reports poor guidance, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students say skipping class makes passing much harder.

In-person reviews strongly show attendance is functionally important, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

69/100

Many recommend him for serious learners, but , and several harsh negative reviews lower confidence.

In-person recommendations are mostly strong for motivated students, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

but unforgiving because and several students call him tough.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide nearly all grading evidence and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention lots of , and as central demands.

Format shift

In-person workload is heavy and study-driven, while the single online review only shows navigation and support problems.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Most students , and helpful, but a minority report ineffective teaching and poor support.

Format shift

but demanding, while online feedback is poor from one review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

91/100

Reviews repeatedly say grades as practice.

Format shift

, while online assessment details are not clear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive but warn that , and .

Main concern

The course is exam-heavy and difficult if students do not study consistently.

What students said

“Your entire grade is based on 5 exams, nothing else.”
ACCT1
“Tony knows his stuff and he's hilarious.”
ACCT1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and says he did not give useful direction when asked for help.

Main concern

Online support appears weak based on the single review.

What students said

“This professor does not help.”
ACCT1
“He did not give direction to an area on the syllabus, did not give book page number or offer a .”
ACCT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is strongly exam-centered, and exams are often hard but usually aligned with class material and study guidance.

Test HeavyFew ExamsHard FinalStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, study guides, and at least one challenging comprehensive final.

Five ExamsHard TestsComprehensive FinalStudy Guides
“Your entire grade is based on 5 exams, nothing else.”
ACCT1
“The so be prepared because it's comprehensive.”
ACCT54
“ and what to study.”
ACCT1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't plan on studying, don't bother taking the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“Tony knows his stuff and he's hilarious.”

🧪

44/100

“Your entire grade is based on 5 exams, nothing else.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

69/100

“If youre an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and funny.
  • Tony is fair, honest, and funny as hell.
  • He will answer everyones questions until they understand the material.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty and Work

  • This is not a class you can snooze through.
  • Accounting 1 is not an easy class and should be taken seriously like a calculus class in terms of difficulty.
  • This course is not simple & easy, you need to study in order to pass his class.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Grades

  • Your entire grade is based on 5 exams, nothing else.
  • but if you dont study you wont pass.
  • , but if you studied the book sections that the instructor emphasized, you should do fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews over many years give detailed and mostly , and workload.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT114 reviews
ACCT26 reviews
ACCT543 reviews
ACCT571 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1