AI Rate Professor

Business

Stephanie Rosenberg

BSMA · MABS101 · BUSMATH · COMP9900 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if the course is online or you are comfortable learning independently despite inconsistent teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent TeachingSelf-Teaching RiskHelpful OnlineExtra CreditParticipation Matters
  • Online feedback is positive, with , and useful career learning.
  • Most in-person feedback is sharply , and little learning.
  • The course can still produce good grades, but the learning experience depends heavily on format and student independence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reported A- grades and help, but students describe confusion and weekly effort rather than an easy A.

Online evidence mentions and 4-6 weekly study hours, while in-person evidence includes A- grades despite poor teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not described as advanced, but it should.

Online students describe the class as worthwhile but not easy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears in reviews, but no comment clearly proves a .

Online and in-person evidence both mention participation signals, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Recommendation depends on format because the online review is strong while .

Online evidence is positive, while and much less recommendable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

A- grades and suggest some grade support, but unclear instructions and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions , while and complaints about inconsistent grading expectations.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The clearest workload estimate is 4-6 hours per week, and in-person students report extra self-teaching burden.

Format shift

Online workload is explicitly moderate, while and self-teaching.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most comments criticize confusing, unfocused, or unhelpful teaching despite one strong online review.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as responsive and useful, while as poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention tasks, software work, Excel, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

Online and and participation than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, describing confusing instruction, poor classroom focus, and a .

Main concern

Several students say they learned little because .

What students said

“She is one of the .”
MABS101
“Basically have to teach yourself.”
BSMA
“I learned absolutely nothing.”
BUSMATH

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is very positive and , and meaningful learning with steady weekly effort.

Main concern

Students still need 4-6 hours of study every week.

What students said

“She will answer all .”
MABS101
“Students need to spend 4-6 hours every week to study, not a easy class but .”
MABS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students need to spend 4-6 hours every week to study, not a easy class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She is one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

47/100

“ and returning students to City College of San Francisco.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Students need to spend 4-6 hours every week to study, not a easy class but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is one of the .
  • Basically have to teach yourself.
  • She confuses herself with the material and clearly wasn't a math major in college.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Support

  • She will answer all .
  • Offer amended credits if you failed because of the software error.
  • I took this class for improving my career skills and I learned a lot.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Students need to spend 4-6 hours every week to study, not a easy class but .
  • It asks you to add information when it doesn't ask in the instructions you send, and when you add it tells you that it is incorrect.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because five reviews span several years and show a consistent in-person pattern, though the online sample is only one review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MABS1012 reviews
BSMA1 review
BUSMATH1 review
COMP99001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values