AI Rate Professor

Business

Michael Needham

MABS68 · BSMA68 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade and can accept weak instruction and participation demands.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy TestsSelf-Teaching RequiredParticipation MattersUnclear InstructionPoor Recommendation
  • Students consistently do not recommend him, even when grades are easy.
  • , but students report low learning value and heavy self-direction.
  • Participation and preparation matter, and one online review describes him as rude and needy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The course appears grade-friendly because tests are described as easy and one student earned an A+ with little test preparation.

, while online evidence gives low difficulty but no grade details.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course does not seem intellectually hard, but and required self-preparation reduce the ease.

but , while the online review focuses more on behavior and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation is repeatedly emphasized and one review says he requires it.

Both online and in-person evidence mention participation pressure, with the online review stating it most directly.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they report rude behavior, confusion, poor learning, and self-teaching.

Both formats are negative, with online feedback focusing on attitude and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Easy tests and an A+ outcome suggest grading is generous even when teaching quality is weak.

Format shift

The , while online reviews only support low difficulty.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Tests may require little preparation, but students are expected to read beforehand and participate.

Format shift

and easy tests, while online evidence stresses required participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students describe him as , and not informative despite some effort to help.

Format shift

Online feedback is sharply negative about attitude, while but still weak on clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, textbook preparation, problem work, and participation without a .

Format shift

and reading, while online evidence mentions participation but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews say he tries to help but often confuses students, and but learning is minimal.

Main concern

Students may need to read ahead and teach themselves to get value from the class.

What students said

“ .”
BSMA68
“ , but participation matters (ask question).”
BSMA68
“This is the class for people who just want an A and learn nothing.”
BSMA68

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative, calling him rude and demanding about participation despite a low difficulty rating.

Main concern

The main issue is poor treatment and participation pressure rather than academic difficulty.

What students said

“Super careless and rude teacher!”
MABS68
“He is super needy and requires participation.”
MABS68

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and need little preparation, while proctoring and exam format are not proven.

Easy TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but does not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, midterm, or .

Easy Tests
“ , but participation matters (ask question).”
BSMA68

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the class for people who just want an A and learn nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“His class is nothing informative or fascinating.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“ unless you are extremely sure you need it.”

📈 Easy Grade Signal

88/100

“ , but participation matters (ask question).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • His class is nothing informative or fascinating.
  • Super careless and rude teacher!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but participation matters (ask question).
  • This is the class for people who just want an A and learn nothing.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • He is super needy and requires participation.
  • He always comes late, and tells us that we have to read the textbook beforehand and prepare questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because three reviews across formats are consistent on low recommendation, but the sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BSMA682 reviews
MABS681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values