AI Rate Professor

History

Susan Englander

HIST1 · HIST12A · HIST12B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Susan Englander if you are comfortable with reading and writing and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableReading heavySupportiveWriting intensiveGenerous grading
  • Students describe Susan Englander as knowledgeable and .
  • The and substantial writing, .
  • Students who keep up with readings and writing prompts tend to do well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

All reported grades are A's and as generous, but and writing work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, including one review of a remote-taken class still counted as in person by the supplied format flag.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The subject is manageable, but the and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Reviews mention discussions and helpful Zoom sessions but do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews; there is .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students generally value her knowledge and support, though because the workload felt excessive.

All recommendation , so confidence is limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

Students report A grades and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload is reading and writing heavy, with one student strongly criticizing the amount of reading.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews, including the remote-taken HIST12B review counted as in person.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students , and engaging, with some pacing concerns in discussions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and written work rather than quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable and but and writing demands.

Main concern

The main and .

What students said

“ .”
HIST12A
“ .”
HIST12B
“She really knows the subject well.”
HIST1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but while another course had no quizzes.

Writing Heavy ExamsNo QuizzesPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, or closed-book format, but and .

Writing Heavy ExamsNo Quizzes
“three essays during the semester (2-3 pages), no quizzes.”
HIST12A
“ .”
HIST12B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really knows the subject well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She really knows the subject well.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“ .”

⚖️

85/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sweet person honestly
  • Very supportive and is accessible to students.
  • Highly knowledgeable in womens history; i learned a lot.

Theme 2

📚

  • Women's America(specific chapters)- no need to read in advance, 'Root of Bitterness' - we've read about 50% of documents, Charity and Sylvia(must).
  • 4 books a week??? Not for me.
  • Make sure to read the other on your own, otherwise you will not do well on the tests.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades & Assessment

  • .
  • Discussions, spreadsheets, three essays during the semester (2-3 pages), no quizzes.
  • Prompts for the and engaged well with the course material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 3 reviews are available, though they contain useful detail and mostly consistent themes.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST11 review
HIST12A1 review
HIST12B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values