AI Rate Professor

Political Science

D Flash

POLISCI · POSL1 · POLS1 · POLSCI1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Flash only if you like discussion-based political science and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized lecturesDiscussion-heavy classNote-dependent examsFair gradingPolarizing teacher
  • Students are sharply and finding the class disorganized or painful.
  • Grades can be fair or manageable if , and complete essays or readings.
  • Assessment risk is high because some reviews say grades depend heavily on a few exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are possible with , and participation, but and few exams raise the effort cost.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is not described as extremely hard, but and critical thinking demands make it harder to absorb.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show mixed experiences with the same class format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as important because notes, participation, and in-class discussion drive success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value open discussion enough to tolerate disorganization and .

and sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some students say she grades fairly and A grades are possible, but others warn that grades depend heavily on a few exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

57/100

Workload is not usually described as heavy, but , and complete essays or chapter notes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

She is knowledgeable and can spark discussion, but repeated complaints about disorganization, mumbling, and dull lectures limit teaching quality.

Format shift

All and is highly mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

Assessment , and chapter notes, though one review says two exams dominate.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable but uneven , and tolerance for disorganization.

Main concern

Disorganization and unclear note-taking make exams risky for structure-dependent students.

What students said

“she is a very nice teacher.”
POLS1
“Absolutely terrible. Grades mostly based on 2 exams.”
POLS1
“So .”
POLS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is moderate because exams may rely heavily on lecture notes without study guides, but .

Two Exams MentionedNo Study Guides MentionedNotes-Based ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes and no study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Two Exams MentionedNo Study Guides MentionedNotes-Based Exams
“Grades mostly based on 2 exams.”
POLS1
“Doesn't give study guides so 2 exams”
POLS1
“ .”
POLS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is awesome. In the start she is a and inconsistent with due dates.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“Ms. Flash knows the subject well and is happy to discuss any related topics brought up in class but tends to be a .”

📈 Effort To Get An A

58/100

“Pay attention and and you will be fine.”

⚠️ Structure Risk

35/100

“So .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is conversational and debates are encouraged.
  • .
  • Smart, but not a teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Notes And Exams

  • while she speaks, but she either mumbles at times or .
  • .
  • Grades mostly based on 2 exams.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Difficulty And Fit

  • challenging not in amount of work but in critical thinking.
  • precise and you learn tons.
  • It was dry and boring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 13 in-person reviews with detailed but .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

POLS19 reviews
POLISCI2 reviews
POLSCI11 review
POSL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values