AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Dan Brooks

POLS1003 · POLS1 · POLYS1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want a without feeling empty.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate LecturerBeginner FriendlyHighly RecommendedLight HomeworkEngaging Discussions
  • Every review praises his passion, clarity, and ability to make political science interesting.
  • Students say the workload is light, with simple projects and only a midterm and .
  • He is especially strong for students who normally dislike or struggle with the subject.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students report A , and only two tests, though participation and learning still matter.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course is approachable because and relates political science to everyday life.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course-easiness score reflects classroom sections only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews mention class participation and discussion, but they .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because he makes an , and useful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

The and comments , and a simple final project.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Students describe not much homework, a , and only a midterm and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

All reviews describe him as passionate, helpful, engaging, and effective at making the subject understandable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

One review mentions a , while another emphasizes class participation and discussion.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently describe Brooks as passionate, helpful, and easy to follow.

Main concern

The small review sample is very positive but limited.

What students said

“Not a lot of and there are only 2 test (midterm/final).”
POLS1
“ and very helpful.”
POLS1
“100% recommended, just be prepared to learn.”
POLYS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention only a midterm, final, and , open-book rules, or exam strictness.

MidtermFinalSimple Final Project

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

MidtermFinalSimple Final Project
“the and there are only 2 test (midterm/final).”
POLS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and very helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

97/100

“He is an excellent teacher who is so passionate about the subject and keeps it interesting every class.”

Recommendation Rate

96/100

“100% recommended, just be prepared to learn.”

Workload and Grades

84/100

“Not a lot of and there are only 2 test (midterm/final).”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • he is very help and passionate about his work.
  • keeps it interesting every class.
  • .

Theme 2

Difficulty and Workload

  • he made it easy to pass & learn.
  • Not a lot of and there are only 2 test (midterm/final).
  • The class requires critical thinking and class participation in discussion.

Theme 3

Recommendation

  • and very helpful.
  • 100% recommended, just be prepared to learn.
  • I feel like a much more well informed individual for it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The four reviews are detailed and unanimous, but the sample size is small and older.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLS12 reviews
POLS10031 review
POLYS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values