AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Christina Rivera

EAR30 · EAR26 · EAR28 · EAR33 · EAR20 · EAR19 · EAR3343453 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if another ECE instructor is available; expect , and high stress for modest learning payoff.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized Canvas & deadlinesTough picky graderTalks about her sonTimed high-stress examsMandatory lecture low value
  • Most students report poor organization, unclear lectures, and .
  • Workload often includes many papers, journals, discussion posts, and .
  • A minority of students like lab placements or find online sections manageable, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even easy content can become a hard A because of , and .

Online timed exams and ; in-person students also report harsh late grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Material is not advanced, but volume of papers, journals, and content itself.

Both formats describe busywork-heavy difficulty more than advanced theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Many in-person and as required even when lectures feel low value.

; online is mixed but still includes required participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only about a , and recent comments repeatedly say never take her if you have options.

only scattered positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

grading, and highly specific point cuts.

Format shift

Online students emphasize discussion and timed-test grading; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report , and weekly assignment piles.

Format shift

Online sections especially stack journals and discussions; in-person sections pile worksheets and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant themes are reading slides, , and weak support outside class.

Format shift

Negative teaching tone is consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Courses combine frequent assignments and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress timed tests more; , and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, she talks about her child, and organization or office-hour support is weak.

Main concern

little chance to recover.

What students said

“she just sort of reads the powerpoint slides, so you're better off just doing the reading yourself.”
EAR20
“she did nothing but talk about her son the entire lecture period”
EAR28
“During office hours, I attempted to discuss my questions, but I was turned away without an explanation.”
EAR19

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mainly cite chaotic Canvas setups, , and stressful timed exams.

Main concern

Timed exams and .

What students said

“i advise you to never choose this professor. and .”
EAR20
“tests our tests were 50 questions 75% multiple choice with only 30 minutes available.”
EAR20
“Her lecture videos are pointless because she reads of .”
EAR28

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often timed tightly and treated as the grade-breaker, with little evidence of open-book friendliness.

Timed examsShort time limitsPop quizzesHigh stress tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but provide less format detail beyond pop quizzes and study-from-book pressure.

Pop quizzesExam-focused study from book
“This professor only talked about food and her son archer and quized us on her son as well.”
EAR19
“I read the book she provided to study for quizzes and the final.”
EAR28

Online

Online students describe timed, high-pressure exams and quizzes with limited minutes and little flexibility.

Timed exams30-minute multi-question testsNo time adjustments
“tests our tests were 50 questions 75% multiple choice with only 30 minutes available.”
EAR20
“ and wont adjust, 30-35 questions 20 minutes, 100 question 50 minutes.”
EAR3343453
“ and extremely stressful”
EAR28

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i advise you to never choose this professor. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she just sort of reads the powerpoint slides, so you're better off just doing the reading yourself.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“NEVER!!!! Take her class if you respect yourself.”

⏱️

32/100

“tests our tests were 50 questions 75% multiple choice with only 30 minutes available.”

⚖️

22/100

“VERY SPECIFIC AND TEDIOUS GRADING, make sure your discussion response is 76 words because with 70 words she will mark it down 5!! points”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just reads the book & can't do so without talking about her son the entire time
  • talks to you like your 4
  • she did nothing but talk about her son the entire lecture period

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and extremely stressful
  • grades horribly and
  • will grade your work on the LAST day and be extremely harsh

Theme 3

📂 About Organization

  • and
  • the entire class
  • Course materials are clearly recycled from one semester to another

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one reviews over many years show a consistent negative pattern with enough volume in both formats.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 524

Course coverage

EAR1914 reviews
EAR2811 reviews
EAR209 reviews
EAR333 reviews
EAR302 reviews
Show 2 more courses
EAR261 review
EAR33434531 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 6 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2