AI Rate Professor

English

Carmen Carrillo

ENG1A · ENGLISH50 · ENG60 · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGLISH60A · ENG60B · 138 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
13.39%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid this professor entirely unless you have no other English option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderNo Clear FeedbackEssay Revision LoopPoor CommunicationRun Away
  • Nearly all recent grades reported are F or .
  • Students and delayed or useless feedback.
  • and strict submission rules with almost no support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Grade reports cluster on F and drop and comments say she fails students with little path to recover.

; the single online review is also a failing narrative.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty is not intellectual challenge alone but opaque criteria endless revisions and .

In-person reviews dominate and uniformly call the class brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation is used to decide quizzes.

In-person evidence drives this; online sample is too small to contradict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is about 13 percent and the dominant student message .

; one online review agrees.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Tough grader tags dominate and comments.

Format shift

In-person evidence is nearly unanimous; online only echoes failure.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

and strict multi-file submission rules pile stress without proportional teaching.

Format shift

and quiz grind.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say lectures go off and YouTube becomes the real teacher.

Format shift

Nearly all .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Essays revisions quizzes and supportive practice.

Format shift

and end-of-term grading surprises.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English 1A reviews are overwhelmingly hostile citing no teaching harsh essay grading early dismissals ignored medical needs and students failing without understanding expectations.

Main concern

Students report failing and .

What students said

“This was the . Whatever you do, DO NOT take this professors course.”
1A
“Overall, the lack of , and poor communication made this class much harder than it needed to be.”
ENGLISH1A
“She is the . She doesn't show ANY sympathy for her students”
1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole online review is strongly negative about communication responsiveness and overall hostility.

Main concern

No useful support and a failing experience reported.

What students said

“Makes students wait never answers emails works as. BULLY unethical and handicapped parking not disabled nonono”
1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel high-stakes and opaque with quizzes tied to participation and harsh essay standards.

Tough Essay GradingPop QuizzesUnclear RubricsLate Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests or quizzes that feel poorly aligned to teaching.

Pop QuizzesEssay RevisionsHarsh Essay Standards
“she will decide whether to have a .”
ENGLISH1A
“we only wrote 3 essays but we "revised" them 3 or 4 times and turned them in over and over with ”
ENG60B

Online

Single online review does not clearly describe exam software or open-book rules only overall hostility.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the . Whatever you do, DO NOT take this professors course. There is absolutely no teaching at all, no feedback, insane criteria that is impossible to follow”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews dominated by in-person English 1A failure narratives after filtering repetitive spam phrases. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

12/100

“ AND YOUR TIME.”

📝

8/100

“She is the . She doesn't show ANY sympathy for her students”

🏫 Teaching Void

12/100

“There is absolutely no teaching at all, no feedback, insane criteria that is impossible to follow”

📉 Failing Outcomes

8/100

“will most likely have you failing or on the brink of failing the entire semester, and you won't truly know if you will pass the course or not.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Youtube was our professor.
  • dismissing classes early (sometimes after only 5 minutes), not showing up to class without notice
  • It felt pointless to go to her lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She is the .
  • I've lost "
  • your writing is not up to her standards she will fail you with no hesitation.

Theme 3

💔 About Support

  • I told her that my mother died and she did not extend the deadline
  • Despite being with DSPS, she was rude and refused to help when I reached out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

138

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews and extreme grade skew support a but many comments are repetitive spam-like or off-topic which lowers pure data quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 595

Course coverage

1A22 reviews
ENGLISH1A17 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENG601 review
ENG60B1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH501 review
ENGLISH60A1 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

41

F 41

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Rather not say 1