AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Pam Crampton

MAT11 · MAT35 · MAT52 · MAT36 · MATH36 · MATH11 · MAT9 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.72%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and can handle harsh enforcement, daily grind, and zero flexibility.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely harsh attendanceOverwhelming daily workloadPop quizzes every classVideo-note self teachingHigh drop rate
  • Most students describe a rude, high-pressure class with and pop quizzes.
  • Teaching often means watching other teachers videos then doing worksheets under strict rules.
  • A small minority who already know math and use every resource can pass and even praise the structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

, and many withdrawals make an A rare and high-effort.

Both formats report tough grading; in person adds pop quizzes and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Fast pace, precalc-level expectations, and daily notes plus quizzes make the content feel brutal for average students.

In person is described as especially fast and quiz-heavy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Attendance is enforced to the extreme, with lateness counted as absences and .

; online also marks attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and comment tone are overwhelmingly negative, with only a few structure-focused defenders.

Negative consensus holds across online and in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

; missed work and calculator or typing rules can zero credit with little sympathy.

Format shift

Both formats call her a ; in person also reports zero quiz makeups.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Daily video notes, frequent homework, and classes.

Format shift

Online emphasizes multi-hour daily video notes; in person adds almost-every-class pop quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students say she does not really teach, relies on outside videos, and communicates in a demeaning way.

Format shift

A few in-person students praise tools and feedback; the majority online and in person call teaching poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Pop quizzes, frequent tests, and and homework.

Format shift

Both formats are quiz and test heavy; but often counts little.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and perceived disrespect.

Main concern

Students get dropped for lateness or absences and feel berated when asking for help.

What students said

“Pam Crampton is the two years of college.”
MAT9
“Expect allowed.”
MAT9
“RUN! Prof. Crampton doesn't show respect or empathy for her students PERIOD.”
MAT9

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections still demand heavy video notes and , and little instructional value.

Main concern

Video-based self-teaching plus high workload and low instructional support.

What students said

“The majority of your work will be 2-3 hours of daily video notes/ 1-2 hour math lab hw 6/7 days a week”
MAT9
“Uses video lectures done by other teachers and so you basically have to teach yourself everything.”
MAT9
“a . First week of class professor was rude”
MAT11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is high-pressure with constant pop quizzes, limited makeups, and .

Pop Quizzes Every ClassNo Quiz RetakesNo CalculatorTest Question Redos at Office HoursStrict Deadlines

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is defined by nearly every-class pop quizzes, few makeups, and .

Pop Quizzes Every ClassNo Quiz RetakesOffice Hour Test RedosNo Calculator
“Expect allowed.”
MAT9
“ .”
MAT9
“makes you do everything by hand and wont let you use a calculator.”
MAT9

Online

Online reviews emphasize heavy graded video notes and .

Heavy Video NotesTough GradingSelf-Taught Tests
“they count . Miss 3 though and you get dropped”
MAT9
“when she grades she doesn't tell you why you got it wrong.”
MAT36

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFFESSOR DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFFESSOR”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting harsh enforcement, self-teaching, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

24/100

“ !!!”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

12/100

“There was alooooooot of homework so be prepared for that.”

🧪

22/100

“she relies HEAVILY on other teachers videos.”

⏱️ Zero Flexibility

8/100

“If you are not in class, you are absent. The reason you are not in class does not change the fact that you are absent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can't teach just reads from the book
  • she doesn't teach it her way and would rather have a video do it for her
  • She has a great method of teaching and does everything she can to ensure that you understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Started with a full class (20+) and only six students remained by the end of the term.
  • , so my A was actually a C at the end.
  • If you aren't already .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Atmosphere

  • very rude and likes to make sly remarks to students
  • she makes fun of students for
  • she has no empathy for her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with high volume, multi-year coverage, and strong consensus on harshness and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 553

Course coverage

MAT936 reviews
MAT367 reviews
MAT113 reviews
MAT351 review
MAT521 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH111 review
MATH361 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

31

Drop/Withdrawal 19 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 4