AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tanisha Flowers

PSY1 · PSY9 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid unless you must; online PSY1 is widely described as unresponsive and unorganized, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveDisorganized onlineHands-off teachingTough graderTest heavy
  • Online sections draw the harshest reviews for , and last-minute due date changes.
  • Students often self-teach from slides and textbooks with .
  • In-person PSY9 reviews are less hostile and sometimes call her funny, but still describe self-teaching and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few students report and doable tests, but , and incomplete grades make an A unreliable.

Online reviews stress nitpicking and harshness more; a if you study.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is intro-level psychology, but , and poor organization raise the real challenge.

; online adds confusion from mismatched lectures and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as optional while several in-person and online reviews mark it mandatory or warn you will not pass if .

Online is mixed optional versus mandatory; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about one in , and most comments urge students toward another professor.

Online is almost uniformly negative; and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Repeated tough-grader and nitpick comments and opaque.

Format shift

and picky scoring; in-person notes clearer multiple-choice tests but .

Workload

Light

58/100

Often graded by few things with limited assignments, though reading load and papers can still add up.

Format shift

Both formats mention few graded items; online can still feel heavy because of papers and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students repeatedly say she , and and textbooks.

Format shift

Online quality is much worse; in-person students sometimes enjoy humor but still report hands-off teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Test-heavy tags and frequent coaching on homework.

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes and major tests; and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed-to-mild; some praise funny podcasts and , but many still say you mostly teach yourself and .

Main concern

, and weak organization still leave students teaching themselves.

What students said

“You mostly teach yourself by reading the textbook and videos that . .”
PSY9
“A lot of reading and the lectures go by fast since we only meet once a week. She always tries to make her podcasts fun.”
PSY9
“Doesnt teach, youre on your own in this class. She just posts powerpoints and thats it.”
PSY1

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PSY1/PSY9 is repeatedly called unorganized, unresponsive, and nitpicky, with and little teaching or feedback.

Main concern

, and last-minute due date or content changes make the course hard to navigate.

What students said

“She did not respond to emails, did not offer feedback on discussion boards, would not explain why you did not get full credit even if you followed all of her tedious instructions.”
PSY1
“ and due times last minute. difficult to get a clear answer from her or/difficult to find information on canvas.”
PSY1
“Not a lot of work, didn't learn anything, you have to teach yourself she doesnt provide many lectures.”
PSY9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly standard quizzes and multiple-choice tests; some study guides help, but others say guides and lectures do not match the quiz.

Multiple choice examsQuizzes with study guidesTest heavyLimited time on major quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as multiple choice and doable if you study and complete study guides carefully.

Multiple choice examsStudy guidesSpecific test questions
“ though.”
PSY9
“DO THE STUDY GUIDES!! Dont just look over basic stuffs, the .”
PSY9

Online

Online quizzes can feel tough, limited in time, and poorly aligned with lectures or study guides; .

QuizzesStudy guides sometimes mismatchedLimited quiz timeTest heavy
“the have to watch like 10 Youtube videos and really focus on everything going on in it.”
PSY1
“Study guides have not matched what was on the quizzes, they seem like just extra work. ...”
PSY1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She did not respond to emails, did not offer feedback on discussion boards, would not explain why you did not get full credit even if you followed all of her tedious instructions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (10 online, 5 in person), highlighting weak teaching, online disorganization, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Doesnt teach, youre on your own in this class. She just posts powerpoints and thats it.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ . This professor is never available and nitpicks everything.”

🧩 Online Chaos

25/100

“online class does not favor this professor well. other reviews favor her better for in person class”

⚖️

28/100

“This professor was very rude to me when I addressed my confusion with an assignment. She also is not lenient at all or .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gives you the materials but rarely ever teaches
  • you basically just teach yourself the material
  • She always tries to make her podcasts fun

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you study
  • , so the

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • changes due dates and due times last minute
  • more difficult than it needs to be

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews from 2020-2026 with consistent themes of weak teaching and online disorganization; sample is moderate and slightly older for some in-person notes.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PSY19 reviews
PSY96 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2