AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Omar Mendez-Guerrero

MAT12 · MAT11 · MATH12 · STATISTICS1 · MAT112 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
70.97%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Strong pick for stats or support-heavy lower math; be cautious in calc if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized by courseTest-heavy calc riskCaring stats teacherPatient and accessibleHomework low weight
  • many love him in stats or lower-level math, while recent calc reviews are brutal.
  • Courses are often test-heavy with .
  • When lectures and study guides , and highly recommendable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is realistic in some stats sections with study guides, but recent .

Online and in-person both show the same course split: easier lower-level success versus calc grade risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty depends on course level; while calc is described as very hard.

Both formats report easier stats-style experiences and harder calc experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

Many sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that missing lectures hurts because content builds.

; online reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation rate is solid overall, but recent calc backlash pulls this down from a must-take.

Older online praise is warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call him lenient with partial credit; recent calc reviews say points are cut harshly for small mistakes.

Format shift

In-person calc comments are harshest; stats and some online classes sound fairer.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

, but it often counts little compared with quizzes and exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework with low grade impact in test-heavy sections.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many students praise patience, clarity, and accessibility, while a vocal group says lectures and .

Format shift

In-person stats praise is strongest; recent in-person and online calc reviews drag quality down.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and ; homework and labs often contribute little.

Format shift

and in-person calc-style comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between glowing stats or liberal-arts math praise and recent .

Main concern

and feel harder than reviews or homework.

What students said

“Omar is the man and was exceptional as an instructor in math”
MAT12
“ examples he shows in class, its completely different and difficult.”
MAT112

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some older students found him caring and easy, while recent and unforgiving.

Main concern

you for exams.

What students said

“If you pay attention in lecture, do the hw and do the study guides, this is an easy A (even if you struggle with math).”
MAT11
“the homework and class sessions do not provide much help in preparing for exams”
MAT112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many and high point weight, which students either master or find harsh.

Test heavyHandwritten examsNo cheat sheets in some sectionsStudy guides sometimes mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sheets in some classes, and high exam weight.

Handwritten examsNo cheat sheetsTest heavyPartial credit sometimes
“ .”
MAT12
“The class and he gives partial credit too.”
MAT12

Online

Online reviews for higher math stress test-heavy grading and .

Test heavyHomework low weightStudy guide dependence
“The of the course points, while homework is worth very little”
MAT112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Omar is the man! I personally hate math classes ... but he made the class very easy for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 , and care themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“He made stats easy to understand- coming from someone who isn't good with math.”

⚠️

34/100

“ examples he shows in class”

❤️ Care & Access

80/100

“ and , but his students as well.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“I don't know why Mr. Guerrero is receiving low ratings. He's literally the most chill & kind hearted professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as I have adhd
  • takes his time teaching you the problems
  • answers everyone's questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • basically 80 percent of and final
  • small mistakes

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessment

  • Test heavy
  • everything done by Hand
  • and his class average for our exams were less than 35%

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one recent and older reviews with detailed grade-policy notes and a .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MAT1215 reviews
MAT1128 reviews
MATH123 reviews
STATISTICS13 reviews
MAT112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 6 · A 10

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2