AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Jennifer Corr

ACC1B · AACC · ACCT1A · ACC1A · ACC66 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.78%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can self-teach accounting from Cengage and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCengage homework heavySelf-taught expectationMandatory attendancePoint-system gradingPolarizing demeanor
  • and readings dominate the course.
  • Many students pass with an A , but .
  • and several students describe a strict or rude classroom tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A and Cengage completion can yield an A, but and self-study.

Online reviews include both easy-A and drop stories; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Accounting content plus rushed or the book and videos.

Both formats stress self-teaching; in-person students more often call lectures rushed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews report mandatory attendance tied to points or staying enrolled, with little flexibility for absences.

Evidence is strongest from in-person ACC1A/1B; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; praise for structure and points battles with complaints about rudeness and self-teaching.

Online has both strong recommenders and communication complaints; in-person is more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Point systems and help, but many tags still call her a and work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Nearly every review cites lots of , and reading each week.

Format shift

Online winter and ACC modules can feel especially overloaded.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students split between clear resources and .

Format shift

Online success stories exist, but and clarity are frequent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Cengage homework, quizzes, discussions, and ; finals matter less if .

Format shift

Both formats center Cengage; some .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ACC1A/1B is homework-heavy with mandatory attendance; and rude self-taught lectures.

Main concern

and uneven teaching clarity.

What students said

“ . . Professor not helpful and rude.”
ACC1A
“her class is made up of 3000 points, so you have many opportunities to get the grade you want!”
ACC1A
“ if you are busy with your other classes.”
ACC1B

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections still run through Cengage with ; some praise organization while others report weak communication and .

Main concern

High workload and .

What students said

“It wasn't bad, but it was definitely a lot of work for seemingly no reason.”
ACC1B
“The teacher was distant, lacking communication and providing generic responses .”
ACC66
“ .”
ACC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist and some say finals are fair, but overall success .

Cengage quizzesFinal examHomework mirrors testsPoint-based course

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students mention finals and ; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctored formats.

Final examQuizzesLarge point pool
“ .”
ACC1A
“As long as and .”
ACC1A

Online

Online comments rarely detail proctoring; success and quizzes rather than proven open-book rules.

Cengage quizzesTest heavy (some sections)
“if you're online or in person its all through Cengage.”
ACC1B
“Curriculum doesn't help with quizzes and tests.”
ACC66

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you need accounting for your major, try a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews (9 online, 33 in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚

24/100

“She .”

🎯

34/100

“ . Professor not helpful and rude.”

⚖️

58/100

“her class is made up of 3000 points, so you have many opportunities to get the grade you want!”

👍 Mixed Recommendation

48/100

“Prof Corr is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you will teach yourself, 100% by just the videos and book
  • She rushes through the chapters
  • Prof teaches well too

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of Cengage hw that'll take maybe 2-3 hours a week
  • there are tons of points so its easy to get an A
  • She is a and do not expect

Theme 3

📋

  • the class
  • there were 3 assignments for each module of 2-3 chapters
  • If your dog passed the morning of class she will expect you to be in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

42 detailed reviews across many years with consistent , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 55
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ACC1A29 reviews
ACC1B7 reviews
AACC3 reviews
ACCT1A2 reviews
ACC661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 3 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2