Is this an easy A?
MissionImpossible
14/100Grades skew low with , and students say even strong writing still gets hammered.
Both online and ; in-person complaints are more severe and numerous.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Grades skew low with x x, and students say even strong writing still gets hammered.
Both online and x x x x x; in-person complaints are more severe and numerous.
Is the course easy?
x x x x, and strict standards make the intellectual and workload challenge consistently high.
Online mentions dense materials; in x x x x and harsh standards.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x x and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.
x x x x x x x; one online ENG1A listed attendance as not mandatory.
Is this professor recommended?
Would-take-again is about 21% and the dominant message is do not take her for GPA or mental health.
A x x x x x, but overall tone across formats remains strongly negative.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
12/100
x x x x x x; students report nitpicking, D/F papers, and little recovery after low scores.
Format shift
x x x x x x x x x ENG1A/1B.
Workload
Overwhelming
15/100
So many papers, constant essays, packets, and x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online is essay/reading heavy; in person adds in-class writing constraints.
Teaching experience
Poor
28/100
A minority praise care and feedback, but most describe unhelpful, critical, political, or demoralizing instruction.
Format shift
Positive outliers are mostly recent in-person; majority across years remains poor.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
22/100
x x x x x and drafts, with in-class writing segments and rewrites sometimes allowed.
Format shift
Both formats are x x x x x.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
x x x x x x x x, paper-heavy, and demoralizing, with only a few defending her as caring for hard workers.
Main concern
Students report x x x x, and political digressions that make the class feel stacked against them.
What students said
“x x x x x! ... its designed to fail you. she grades extremely difficult and accuses you of using Al”
“x x x x! If I could give her lower than awful I would.”
“This is not an easy A kind of class but she gives as many tools as possible to help. ... Awfully amazing.”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
Online sections still feel tough with x x x x x x and x x.
Main concern
Heavy writing and x x x x x x x.
What students said
“She's willing to help if you put in the work, but is a x x x. x x x x x x”
“she uploaded ALOT of information for that week... material is difficult”
Exam style
Assessment is paper-centered and high-risk, including partial in-class writing and strict compliance with her preferred method.
Assessment risk
Strict
28/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x x x x x without unapproved sources, nitpicky grading, and frequent failing marks.
“she will make you write half of your essay in class and the rests out side the classroom. when writing in class your are not allowed to bring sources that aren't approved by her.”
“She grades everything as an F. ... No matter how good of a writer you think you are, does not matter she'll give you an F.”
Online reviews emphasize constant essays and critical grading without clearly documented webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.
“You will be writing essays constantly, and x x x x x x as well. Overall, a very tough class.”
“she uploaded ALOT of information for that week... material is difficult”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“x x x x x! ... its designed to fail you. she grades extremely difficult and accuses you of using Al even tho you created the x x x.”
“She pretends to care but its for show. x x x x x x x x x the wrong way.”
“x x x x! If I could give her lower than awful I would.”
“x x x x x x x x x x done her way”
“I couldn't disagree more w/ other reviews. x x x x, and caring.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
19
Recent reviews read by the AI
19
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
19 reviews with rich detail, multi-year span, and consistent harsh-grading themes make the negative pattern highly credible despite a few defenders.
Inside 19 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
17 reported outcomes
A+ 1
B 1
C 2 · C- 1
D+ 1 · D 1
F 2
Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 4