AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Eduardo Perez

SOC10 · SOC1H · SOC20 · SOC1 · SOC2 · SOC01 · SOC4333 · SOCIOLOGY1 · 84 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
64.15%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will read, write carefully, and revise; skip if you want an easy GE A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderGives good feedbackAccessible outside classGet ready to readGraded by few things
  • many love his energy and feedback while and unfair
  • Few high-stakes papers and ;
  • , but reading and APA-style writing matter a lot

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many report , so an A usually requires strong writing and revisions.

Online complaints about GE-level hardness are stronger; with effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard intro sociology with and , but writing standards raise the bar.

and papers; online self-teaching complaints are more common.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, but missing too and lectures still help.

In ; online has less attendance pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

About two-thirds would take again, with praise for .

In-person reviews skew warmer; recent online reviews are more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; and papers are hard and feedback can feel harsh.

Format shift

Strictness appears in both formats; some .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Often few assignments and , but papers, discussions, and .

Format shift

Some online and and many papers.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many call lectures engaging and him accessible, while .

Format shift

In-person energy is praised more; online quality is more split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Papers, discussions, and occasional quizzes dominate; .

Format shift

Both formats stress writing; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often praised as personable with interesting lectures, but .

Main concern

and occasional unprofessional or political lecture content.

What students said

“I love Eddie! , and hilarious.”
SOC01
“ and no matter how hard you try if he doesn't agree with your work it'll be an F.”
SOC20
“An easy A if you turn in your work, participate, and show up for class.”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some find straightforward essay/discussion classes with GE and last-minute.

Main concern

, and inconsistent clarity on expectations.

What students said

“It was an easy A as long as you put in a good amount of effort for the assignments.”
SOC1
“Way too difficult for a gen ed class.”
SOC1
“Do not take this professor for sociology 1. and grades things last minute.”
SOC-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many sections emphasize papers and discussions with ; .

Often no finalPapers and discussions heavyOpen book quizzes in some sectionsTake-home quizzes/final reported

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, several note ; closed-book strict proctoring is not clearly proven.

Open book testsTake-home quizzesTake-home finalOnline tests
“hes amazing! but you dont need the book.”
SOC1
“ as well.”
SOC10
“All tests as online.”
SOC2

Online

and ; exams when present are not described as webcam-proctored.

No final in many sectionsEssays and discussionsQuizzes sometimes
“There are some essays but .”
SOC-1
“ .”
SOC1
“ .”
SOC20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Perez is great but !! and hard thats for sure”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mixed online and in-person reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“I love Eddie! , and hilarious.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and no matter how hard you try if he doesn't agree with your work it'll be an F.”

📝 Workload Pattern

55/100

“ A.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“If I could I would get into his class all the time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are interesting and engaging.
  • I love Eddie! , and hilarious.
  • All he does is talk about his political ideas, no topics of sociology are taught at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is a .
  • It was an easy A as long as you put in a good amount of effort for the assignments.
  • Way too difficult for a gen ed class.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • There are some essays but .
  • .
  • Put A LOT of effort on the the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

84

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person from 2016-2025 show consistent tough-grader vs strong-feedback themes with good detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 546
4 out of 513
3 out of 58
2 out of 53
1 out of 514

Course coverage

SOC117 reviews
SOC2015 reviews
SOC-16 reviews
SOC014 reviews
SOC102 reviews
Show 4 more courses
SOC1H2 reviews
SOC22 reviews
SOC43331 review
SOCIOLOGY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 4 · A 15 · A- 2

B range

16

B+ 6 · B 8 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1