AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Marqueeta Booker

N12 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if ; do not rely on her lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak lecturesGet ready to readLots of homeworkSelf-study requiredExtra credit
  • Lectures are widely criticized as pointless or unhelpful
  • She expects mastery before class and
  • Grades can still be fine with reading and , but teaching quality is low

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A with reading and , but difficulty is high and content mastery is expected early.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Nursing content plus expectation to master material before lecture makes the course intellectually hard.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Quality scores are 1-2 with lecture complaints dominating, even though .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades of A and B appear with and .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Tags and comments emphasize lots of homework and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students call lectures the worst so far and say she never returns to unanswered questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews stress reading and exams-only picture.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

worst and expect pre-mastery of content.

Main concern

Lectures feel pointless and unanswered questions are not revisited.

What students said

“Possibly the the ADN program.”
n12
“if shes lecturing good luck lol”
n12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; risk is content mastery expected before lecture.

Lecture-linked questionsHeavy pre-reading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In ; main issue is weak lectures versus pre-class mastery.

Content expected before lecture
“She expects you to have mastered the content prior to the lecture.”
n12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Possibly the the ADN program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting weak lectures and heavy prep. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Possibly the the ADN program.”

📚 Pre-Class Expectations

30/100

“She expects you to have mastered the content prior to the lecture.”

😅 Lecture Value

15/100

“if shes lecturing good luck lol”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Possibly the the ADN program.
  • It felt pointless to go to her lectures.
  • if shes lecturing good luck lol

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Prep

  • She expects you to have mastered the content prior to the lecture.
  • Get ready to read
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent in-person reviews exist, both negative on lectures, so confidence remains low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

n122 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values