AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Dee Thompson

CAT98B · CIS1A · CIS25 · CIS1B · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Prefer her in person if you communicate early; avoid if you need online flexibility or frequent accommodations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFormat-dependentNo exceptions onlineAllows resubmits in personCaring face-to-faceVague online assignments
  • , clarity, and feedback
  • Online reviews accuse her of hostility, vague work, obsolete material, and zero flexibility
  • Your experience likely hinges more on format and communication than raw course difficulty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

In-person resubmits and , but online no-exception policies and vague work erase that safety net.

; online evidence shows little flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content is usually described as straightforward, with difficulty driven more by clarity and workload spikes than abstract theory.

Both formats call material manageable; online friction comes from instructions and tools, not pure content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Multiple in-person and as mandatory when reported.

Evidence is clearer for ; online reports are mixed but still often required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Exactly half the sample is strongly positive and half strongly negative, split almost perfectly by format.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

In-person resubmission and ; online reviews emphasize rigid rules and no makeups.

Format shift

Leniency appears mainly in person; online is described as zero exceptions.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Most weeks seem manageable, though CIS-25 can have heavier assignment weeks and some online classes require expensive software.

Format shift

Workload complaints are stronger online when instructions are vague.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

; online students report hostility and disengagement.

Format shift

; online teaching quality is Awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on homework, resubmits, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and willing to let homework be corrected and resubmitted for full credit.

Main concern

Some weeks in CIS-related courses still carry a heavy but manageable workload.

What students said

“ to understand and makes class feel like a real conversation.”
CIS25
“ and allow you to fix and resubmit for full credit.”
CAT98B
“she , and easily helps you out even outside of class.”
CIS1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe vague assignments, expensive software needs, hostility when asked for help, and a strict no-exceptions policy.

Main concern

Little empathy for software issues or .

What students said

“She's rude, gets hostile when you ask questions, and enjoys verbally abusing students who ask her to slow down or for help.”
CIS1A
“Gives no extensions/accommodations for computer/software incompatibilities/personal issues. NO EXCEPTIONS.”
CAT98B
“The and often don't match the hardware or software we are working on.”
CIS25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe a ; assessment risk is driven more by assignments and flexibility rules.

Assignment-drivenHomework resubmits in personNo makeup work online

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on short lectures and .

Homework resubmissionClear grading criteria
“ and allow you to fix and resubmit for full credit.”
CAT98B

Online

Online reviews ; they stress vague assignments and no makeups instead.

No makeupsVague assignment instructions
“do all of your work bc you can't make up anything.”
CAT98B
“The and often don't match the hardware or software we are working on.”
CIS25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gives no extensions/accommodations for computer/software incompatibilities/personal issues. NO EXCEPTIONS.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews with a . Credibility rating: Medium.

🏫 In-Person Care

90/100

“Professor Thompson is a great teacher, she really cares about her students.”

💻 Online Hostility Risk

15/100

“She's rude, gets hostile when you ask questions, and enjoys verbally abusing students who ask her to slow down or for help.”

🔁 Resubmit Advantage

80/100

“ and allow you to fix and resubmit for full credit.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes class feel like a real conversation
  • Gives good lectures keeps them short and to the point
  • material is obsolete
  • only there to collect a check

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • allow you to fix and resubmit for full credit
  • class itself is not difficult, very straight-forward
  • NO EXCEPTIONS

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • gets hostile when you ask questions
  • Flexible and
  • not empathetic towards students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews, but the and detailed enough to trust the pattern.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CIS1A3 reviews
CAT98B2 reviews
CIS252 reviews
CIS1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1