AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Kendralyn Webber

POL2H · POL141172 · POL43072 · POL4H · POLS4 · POL1 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
62.96%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if and stay on top of ; skip if you want light writing or AI shortcuts.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingEssay-heavyNo AI allowedCaring mentor vibeTough paper grader
  • Many students call POL1 an easy A if and never use AI
  • A large and crushing weekly reading
  • Assessment is mostly essays, discussions, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students report easy As by completing readings and essays on time, but and anti-AI rules block free A seekers.

Online reviews more often say easy A; in-person and honors sections sound stricter on writing quality.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Concepts are usually manageable for a GE politics class, with .

if ; short-term online sessions feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

if the work is submitted.

; some in-person sections still mark attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

About two-thirds would take her again, mainly for clarity, free materials, and .

Positive recommendations appear in both formats; hostility spikes more in tough paper-heavy terms.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and occasional retries coexist with and reading responses.

Format shift

; some in-person students call her an .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly readings, discussions, and multi-page responses dominate, especially in short semesters.

Format shift

Both formats complain about reading volume; .

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many students praise engaging current-events lectures, organization, and care, while critics cite bias or .

Format shift

In-person mentorship comments are warmer; online quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and projects much more than classic finals.

Format shift

; in-person may add a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections praise engaging lectures and mentorship, but and careful anti-AI compliance; a vocal minority finds her harsh or biased.

Main concern

Dense readings plus strict paper standards can overwhelm students new to political science writing.

What students said

“This is an easy A for any reputable student.”
POLS-4
“ and .”
POLS-4
“Absolutely the the .”
POL1

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online POL1 is often called straightforward and schedule-friendly, with free or low textbook cost, but and .

Main concern

Long weekly readings and quickly.

What students said

“Very easy A. Just follow the instructions, do the work on time, and don't use AI”
POL1
“She is an awful professor and a .”
POL1
“ ! She's super sweet and helpful!”
POL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and , though writing standards can still be strict.

Essay-heavyQuizzes with retriesOften no finalVideo essays optionReading responses

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

of essays, and occasional simple exams or simulations rather than lockdown software.

Reading responsesFew essaysOccasional simple examCourtroom simulation
“The class consists of 5 2 page papers (you only have to do 4), one exam, one final, and a court room simulation (easy).”
POL1
“You and they are pretty short but it counts as a big chinch of your grade.”
POL1

Online

Online students often report quizzes, a few essays or video essays, and ; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Video essays no face requiredEasy quizzes with retriesOften no finalChicago-format papers
“Essays are video essays, 5-10 minutes in length, but you don't have to show your face.”
POL1
“ !”
POL1
“the quizzes VERY easy has you get 2 attempts”
POL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy A. Just follow the instructions, do the work on time, and don't use AI, and you should pass this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Dr. Webber is a phenomenal professor. Keeps things relevant and talks about what is actually going on in the world.”

📚 Reading Load

32/100

“Get ready to read at least 20 to maybe 50 pages a week”

✍️

40/100

“This professor is a is nearly impossible to get a perfect score on papers.”

👍 Recommendation Level

64/100

“if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Forever my mentor
  • makes everything easy for us to understand
  • Lectures aren't well structured
  • passionate about her subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is an easy A for any reputable student
  • Not easy A
  • don't use AI

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • a lot of
  • discussion posts and
  • Reading Responses that count for 60% of your grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews over many years, both formats, and repeated themes on reading load and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 513

Course coverage

POL137 reviews
POL4H4 reviews
POLS-44 reviews
POL2H3 reviews
POL1411721 review
Show 1 more courses
POL430721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 5 · A 21

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values