AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Teri Strong

MAT25 · ALGEBRA090 · MA35 · MAT11 · MAT35 · MATH65 · MATH35 · MAT52 · MAT36 · MATH102 · MAT10 · BALGBALG · MATH72 · MATH52 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
19.05%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other math option and can dedicate massive weekly time with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderOverwhelming homeworkTest-heavy finalsCondescending feedbackUnclear lectures
  • Finals and 45% final.
  • and deadlines are unforgiving.
  • Many students describe condescending interactions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and low reported grades make an A very hard even with major effort.

; online comments especially stress the 45% final.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Material moves fast with long lectures and computer-based drills that .

Online and and delivery hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

while others say she does not care if you show up, so policy is inconsistent.

; online attendance notes are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

19/100

and recent comments repeatedly urge students not to enroll.

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative; but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

No late work, , and high-weight finals dominate outcomes.

Format shift

Online policy comments are especially brutal; .

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Students report , and nonstop lecture pace.

Format shift

; online volumes sound especially extreme.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

A large share call lectures unclear or condescending, with only a and helpful.

Format shift

Recent online and posts.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and a very heavy final often .

Format shift

Online MATH102 comments specifically cite a 45% final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Long-running in-person reviews mostly call her tough, sarcastic, lecture-heavy, and and rigor.

Main concern

Harsh and .

What students said

“when asked a smart remark that makes you feel dumb.”
MAT52
“Ridiculous amount of hw! Have to complete 10 hours every week on the computer.”
MATH52
“ so hard and Im a math major and a Stright As student !!! Its 45% of your grade”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online MATH sections draw , and a high-weight final, with almost no would-take-again support.

Main concern

Finals weighted around 45% plus unforgiving deadlines can tank the course quickly.

What students said

“no , and a single missed deadline will tank your grade.”
MATH102
“The being 45% of your grade”
MATH102
“ to complete and she assigned about 8 per week.”
MATH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, frequently described as confusing and brutal, with limited recovery options.

Test heavyFinal about 45% of gradeHard and confusing examsNo extensions

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews also describe extremely hard high-weight finals and .

Hard finalTest heavyShort timed tests
“ so hard and Im a math major and a Stright As student !!! Its 45% of your grade...I had so much anxiety taking it.”
MATH102
“ .”
MAT52

Online

and a final worth about 45% of the grade.

45% finalHard confusing examsTest heavy
“The being 45% of your grade, can't pass if you struggle on it”
MATH102
“ so confusing and hard, just get ready to fail if .”
MATH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, , and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

19/100

“Strongly advise against taking this professor.”

📝

16/100

“no , and a single missed deadline will tank your grade.”

📚

14/100

“ to complete and she assigned about 8 per week.”

🗣️ Classroom Tone

26/100

“there's "no such thing as dumb questions just curious idiots"”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes horrible at teaching.
  • I still felt like I learned nothing because of how bad she lectured.
  • She can be very sarcastic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The Final is 45% of .
  • so confusing and hard
  • 3/4 of the class failed.

Theme 3

⏰ About Workload

  • SO. MUCH. HOMEWORK.
  • Ridiculous amount of hw! Have to complete 10 hours every week on the computer.
  • Way too much homework like 50 problems each section.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews over many years, with , and tone, give a reliable negative pattern.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MAT528 reviews
MATH1027 reviews
MATH356 reviews
MA354 reviews
MAT113 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MAT363 reviews
MATH523 reviews
MAT352 reviews
MATH652 reviews
ALGEBRA0901 review
BALGBALG1 review
MAT101 review
MAT251 review
MATH721 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2