AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Devon Fell

PSY8 · PSY1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and a paid platform; otherwise mixed reviews make her a risk.

Best fit · Budget FirstPolarized reviewsPaid PsyLearn platformWeekly assignment heavyCaring for someCommunication issues for others
  • Reviews and outdated or overloaded course design.
  • Online work often requires a paid secondary platform with multiple weekly tasks.
  • Sample is small, so and communication themes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Several students report easy A's with low difficulty, though workload and platform .

Easy-A language is mainly from online reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Material itself is often described as manageable, but outdated content and multi-part weekly tasks can still frustrate students.

Online students disagree sharply on ease; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, with coursework happening through weekly submissions instead.

Online evidence drives the optional attendance read; the as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 60% would take again, but , and outdated materials keep this from a .

Online reviews are split positive and negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Some students call it an easy A with , while .

Format shift

Positive grade-ease comments are online; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and writing make the load feel high for an intro psych course.

Format shift

Both the in-person review and .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praise for kindness and engagement is balanced by complaints about outdated material and weak communication.

Format shift

Online reviews contain both excellent and awful teaching claims; in-person sample is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and writing dominate more than traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest assignment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and poor email responsiveness.

Main concern

Very high weekly assignment count and .

What students said

“ if you have a life, she assigns 2 long reading modules per week, in total 8 assignments a week!!!”
PSY8

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online psych sections range from easy supportive electives to outdated lectures and heavy weekly platform work.

Main concern

Paid PsyLearn costs, multiple weekly submissions, and uneven communication.

What students said

“this professor was awful. bad at communicating. her course work was out of date”
psy1
“Easy A, fun , and I felt supported and accepted the whole semester.”
PSY8
“this class requires to purchase a subscription to a secondary website. there are 4 assignments a week”
PSY8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment looks assignment- and ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Weekly quizzesPlatform lessonsDiscussion and journal tasksTest heavy tags

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The sole and weekly assignments rather than a .

Heavy weekly modulesMultiple weekly assignments
“she assigns 2 long reading modules per week, in total 8 assignments a week!!!”
PSY8

Online

Online comments emphasize weekly quizzes and platform lessons but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Weekly quizzesPlatform lessonsExtra credit
“there are 4 assignments a , and writing.”
PSY8
“Easy A, fun , and I felt supported and accepted the whole semester.”
PSY8

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A, fun , and I felt supported and accepted the whole semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality, paid platform work, and weekly load. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ , and made her class interesting.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

30/100

“this professor was awful. bad at communicating.”

💸 Platform Cost

40/100

“this class requires to purchase a subscription to a secondary website.”

📚 Weekly Workload

34/100

“in total 8 assignments a week!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her course work was out of date
  • Good prof.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, fun
  • 4 assignments a week
  • she assigns 2 long reading modules per week

Theme 3

💻 About Online Setup

  • purchase a subscription to a secondary website
  • makes her students pay for PsyLearn
  • Online Savvy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews create a polarized picture with limited time depth and conflicting teaching quality claims.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSY84 reviews
psy11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values