Is this an easy A?
EasyA
78/100Multiple students say only lazy students fail because , and .
Online reviews most strongly describe easy As; in person still passable with attendance and presentations.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Multiple students say only lazy students fail because x x x x x, and x x.
Online reviews most strongly describe easy As; in person still passable with attendance and presentations.
Is the course easy?
Content volume can be fast-paced weekly, but intellectual demand is modest when material is pre-made videos and short checks.
Online paced by many chapters per week; in person difficulty feels moderate.
Is attendance flexible?
Online attendance is largely not required beyond occasional Zoom x x; in person values showing up more.
Online is flexible; x x x x x x x x or presentations.
Is this professor recommended?
Split between easy caring online supporters and x x x x x x x and proctoring.
x x x x x; recent online reviews are harsher on quality.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
62/100
Work is often low-stakes and recoverable, though a few call her a x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online easy-pass narrative dominates; x x x x x.
Workload
Light
70/100
Typically short videos, simple HW questions, quizzes, and limited graded items rather than heavy projects.
Format shift
Both formats describe light graded load; online short-term sections can feel rushed.
Teaching experience
Poor
34/100
Persistent theme that she outsources teaching to free videos and provides little original instruction or help.
Format shift
In-person humor helps some students; x x x x x x.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
62/100
Quizzes, tests, and proctored assessments outweigh deep projects, with sparse graded items overall.
Format shift
Online emphasizes proctored tests; in person adds presentations and class video credits.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Older in-person reviews are more mixed-to-positive on humor and real-life examples, but some x x x x x and that x x x x x.
Main concern
Uneven teaching depth and reports of rude emails or x x.
What students said
“This professor was really funny and made econ much easier to understand. x x x x”
“Easy going but fails to teach and help in x x. Be ready to teach yourself.”
“She's personable and made class interesting. Grade is made up of 3 assignments, 3 quizzes, 3 tests, a solo presentation”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
easy assignments and x x x x, but frequent criticism of lazy curation, YouTube-only content, and invasive proctoring.
Main concern
Little original instruction and required anti-cheating software with weak student interaction.
What students said
“She offers none of her own original lecture videos, ALL YouTube links, and long powerpoints.”
“Tests and x x x x x x.”
“It's extremely easy to pass her classes. You just have to watch Khan Academy videos and answer 1 or 2 questions”
Exam style
Online exams often require invasive proctoring software, which students find strict even when content itself is easy.
Assessment risk
Strict
32/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x as fair if you attend and read; one pandemic-era note mentions creepy proctoring browser use with remote materials.
“x x x x x x x x x but- participate, and read.”
“you have to download a browser called Protocio which is very creepy.”
Multiple online reviews explicitly cite invasive proctoring, Proctorio-like tools, or x x x.
“Tests and x x x x x x.”
“You have to install a x x x x x.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“This is the laziest professor ever! x x x x x if you want to teach yourself the material.”
“She fails to teach. We are learning off of 3, 10 minute, kahn academy vids every 2 weeks and a very simple powerpoint.”
“Only the laziest people would fail this class.”
“Tests and x x x x x x.”
“x x x x x x x x x x my favorite professors I've ever had.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
12
Recent reviews read by the AI
12
Lifetime ratings
55/100
Evidence confidence
Twelve reviews show a x x x and proctoring pattern, but the small sample and pre/post-pandemic split keep confidence moderate.
Inside 12 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
9 reported outcomes
A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1
B 1
C 1 · C- 1
D 1
No reported values
Incomplete 1