AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phuongthao VO

MAT5343197 · MAT12 · MAT11 · MAT35 · MATH35 · MATH1979 · MATH25 · MAT52 · MATH53 · MAT10 · MATH11 · MAT112 · MAT53 · MATH4789 · MATH52 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
8.7%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and and tutors.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCan't solve own problemsCrushing homeworkTests mismatch lectureHarsh graderTeach yourself
  • Many students say she rushes, mis-solves problems, and .
  • Homework volume is extreme and .
  • A small older minority liked and organization; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Class averages and many Ds, Fs, and plus luck, not normal effort.

; the one online review also expects most average students below a B.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material is standard college math, but rush pace and should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skip-class tags appear with little flexibility.

In-person evidence is strong; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is under 10% and the dominant .

Negative consensus is strongest in person; the lone online review also steers students elsewhere.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and nitpicky point docks make high grades rare.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person courses; online sample is one harsh review.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report dozens of sections weekly with 25-35 .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant themes are wrong answers on tests, memorize-it responses, rushed chapters, and condescending tone.

Format shift

A few older positives exist, but recent and majority voice is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Exams and finals carry huge weight while .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are widely described as rushed, homework-heavy, test-harsh, and and fails.

Main concern

; huge problem counts and little patience for questions.

What students said

“You've been warned: .”
MAT53
“Her teaching in class does not match the homework and the .”
MATH11
“This professor can't even solve .”
MAT10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online but cannot teach or solve problems and average students struggle above a B.

Main concern

Teaching quality and problem accuracy, not format logistics.

What students said

“She cant solve her own problems or any others but gives them to you thinking you can. and I would love her if she could actually teach.”
MAT112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and homework, with limited partial credit and high fail rates.

Timed examsNo calculator sometimesTests mismatch homeworkPartial credit limitedExtra credit occasional

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, sometimes no calculator, and graded harshly.

Timed examsMismatch to lecture/homeworkTough gradingNo cheat sheets
“only got 90 minutes for ? Too bad!)”
MAT53
“no partial credit. Right/wrong answers only.”
MAT52
“She won't let you use cheat sheets.”
MAT35

Online

Single online review does not detail proctoring; it stresses poor teaching and .

Tough grading
“I will be suprised is anyone averge at math gets above a B.”
MAT112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You've been warned: .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews (1 online, 37 in-person), highlighting teaching failures, overload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She cant solve her own problems or any others but gives them to you thinking you can.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“DO .”

📚 Workload

12/100

“Gives an unrealistic amount of homework.”

📝

20/100

“when it comes to the exams theres like 2 problems that make sense, then the rest doesnt correlate to what she lectures or whats in the homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When students ask specific questions her answer always is "That's the rule, memorize it."
  • she rushes through everything
  • Prepare to teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class average is a D in
  • Started with a class of 40, ended with 9

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Makes you feel stupid when asking a question
  • gives angry speeches. grades harshly
  • She is a rude teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews over many years show a durable negative , and exam mismatch, with only scattered positives.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH1110 reviews
MAT525 reviews
MAT534 reviews
MAT103 reviews
MAT1122 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MAT122 reviews
MAT352 reviews
MATH47892 reviews
MATH532 reviews
MAT-53-431971 review
MAT111 review
MATH19791 review
MATH251 review
MATH351 review
MATH521 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

3

D 3

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 2