AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Edgar Rodriguez

SOC10 · SOC20 · SOC1 · SOC2 · SOCIOLOGY2 · SOCIOLOGY1 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
31.71%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you need a fair grade or real instruction; only consider if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDoes Not TeachCheating AccusationsLecture HeavyHarsh and Unhelpful
  • Recent reviews overwhelmingly call him one of the and little teaching.
  • Getting a high grade is extremely hard; many report Cs, Ds, Fs, or withdrawals despite heavy effort.
  • Older in-person reviews were more mixed-positive about humor, but current online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report Fs and , and because grading is opinion-based and extremely harsh.

Both online and ; online adds cheating accusations and vague feedback.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is made harder , and unclear expectations rather than inherently advanced theory alone.

Online emphasizes reading and timed work; and pop-quiz pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

In-person and many hybrid sections treat attendance as mandatory while some , yet participation still affects success.

; online is mixed but still high-stakes on deadlines and presence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and recent comments repeatedly say avoid at all and poor teaching.

Online ; older in-person reviews are more split but recent in-person is also strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Tough grader tags dominate; students say work and rarely saves grades.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and online homework platforms create a high workload for modest grade payoff.

Format shift

Online mentions 24-hour assignment dumps and Pearson work; and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A minority praise funny lectures, but most recent students say he does not teach, is condescending, and is hard to reach.

Format shift

; recent online and in-person reviews rate teaching very low.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, pop quizzes, and a few high-stakes projects .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; online also stresses graded discussions and writing scored harshly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person classes split older fans of funny lectures from newer reports of bullying, impossible tests, and .

Main concern

, and hostile classroom climate that .

What students said

“ ! I never felt like I needed to write a review before but here I go. !”
SOC20
“He is the one of the ! he dose not know how to TEACH”
SOCIOLOGY1
“Professor makes you teach yourself the material and lectures are pointless.”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely described as unsupportive, with slow or rude , and frequent cheating accusations.

Main concern

, and little real teaching content.

What students said

“READ THIS! ! I swear I learned more regarding sociology as a whole through YouTube than what he had to provide for us.”
SOC1
“ . This professor was extremely rude, I asked him about one of and accused me of cheating.”
SOC2
“DOES NOT TEACH, he does absolutely nothing to help his students.”
SOC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as extremely hard, specific, and poorly supported, with little student-friendly flexibility reported.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesNo Study GuidesHarsh Specific AnswersCheating Accusations

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult; students say reading and lecture notes still fail to produce passing scores.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesNo Study Guides
“ .”
SOC20
“He does not make study guides for the tests and .”
SOC1

Online

Online assessments are harsh quizzes and exams with vague expectations; students report low scores without explanation and cheating accusations.

Harsh QuizzesVague ExpectationsCheating Accusations
“Would give me a low score on the .”
SOC10
“ for extremely specific answers but not give examples of what he's looking for.”
SOC2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . This professor was extremely rude, I asked him about one of and accused me of cheating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and teaching themes. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

22/100

“ ! He's mean he calls out students!”

📉

14/100

“His is a harsh and an . Also condescending and unhelpful when asking for .”

📚

32/100

“DOES NOT TEACH, he does absolutely nothing to help his students.”

💥 Grade Risk

12/100

“No amount of reading and comprehension of the textbook and lecture notes will help someone pass this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he dose not know how to TEACH
  • lectures are pointless
  • I learned more regarding sociology as a whole through YouTube

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • class average was around 60%
  • I received no higher than a

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Will accuse you of cheating!!
  • He's mean he calls out students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning many years with consistent and teaching support a high-confidence picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 523

Course coverage

SOC130 reviews
SOCIOLOGY18 reviews
SOC25 reviews
SOC203 reviews
SOC102 reviews
Show 2 more courses
881 review
SOCIOLOGY21 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 5 · B 3

C range

10

C+ 4 · C 6

D range

5

D+ 2 · D- 3

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 9