AI Rate Professor

English

Danielle Stokes

ENG1A · ENG1A1B · ENG42708 · 1B · ENG1B · 1B47123 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.31%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Stokes for ENG 1A/1B if you want a and are ready to keep up with and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and responsiveLots of reading and essaysClear feedbackStrict deadlinesExtra credit available
  • Most students praise her as , and willing to grant extensions when you communicate.
  • weekly and final, plus WRC/lab hours.
  • An A is realistic if and submit on time, but last-week essay cramming and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many earn A or and assignments on time, but and late work is often not free.

Most grade-and-effort evidence is from online ENG 1A/1B; in-person comments also say work hard and you will do well.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard composition work, but volume of , and labs makes the course feel demanding.

Online and and writing for ENG 1A/1B.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Many mark attendance mandatory while others say optional; and WRC hours mattering.

Online reviews mix mandatory and ; as yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

About 84% would take her again; most praise care and clarity despite workload and a few harsh outliers.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with and online mostly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and she often works with students who communicate, but several call her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly discussions, multiple essays, research paper, timed exams, reading load, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload is the dominant theme in both online and in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Most students describe her as caring, clear, organized, and or weak lectures online.

Format shift

Teaching praise is consistent across formats; complaints cluster in a few online experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and labs, with timed midterm and final writings also counting.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and weekly work over traditional multiple-choice exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviewers call her intelligent, fair, and and writing expected for English 1A.

Main concern

Tough but fair class with ; .

What students said

“Professor Stokes is one of my favor professors at RCC. She is intelligent, fun, fair, and always ready to help.”
ENG1A
“It was a tough class but I loved it. You have to read everything assigned in order to do good on the class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG 1A/1B is structured and navigable with , and often WRC/lab requirements; Stokes is usually fast on Canvas and flexible if you message her.

Main concern

Strict due dates, heavy end-of-term , and a paid program fee mentioned by some.

What students said

“ ! It is structured in a way that is easy to follow.”
ENG1A
“There were 4 essays (I believe) + a .”
ENG1A
“She emailed me to check on me and gave me a was sick with Covid.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

large essay and discussion load rather than open-book multiple choice.

Timed midterm and final writingsEssay-heavy courseDiscussion boardsWRC or lab requirement

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and weekly boards; exam proctoring details are not clearly described.

Essays and research paperWeekly discussion boardsExtra credit
“There are 3 essays and a research paper as well as .”
ENG1A

Online

Online students report timed midterm and and weekly discussion posts; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

Timed midterm and finalMultiple essaysWeekly discussionsWRC/lab hours
“There were 4 essays (I believe) + a .”
ENG1A
“The Midterm and .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Stokes was one of the , and she made my first year of college great, you can tell she really cares about her students and wants them to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (43 online, 7 in person), highlighting care, composition workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

💙 Student Support

86/100

“She emailed me to check on me and gave me a was sick with Covid.”

📚 Heavy Comp Workload

32/100

“There is quite a bit of work but as long as you manage your time well you'll do fine.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

84/100

“ ! It is structured in a way that is easy to follow.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She clearly cares about her students and even offered for a .
  • She sets the !! Great prof!!
  • but interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do all of the assignments, and you will pass.
  • She is a bit of a but it really helps if you contact her and discuss .
  • as long as you back up your thinking its an easy A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Risks

  • 3 (THREE!) .
  • For the last 2-3 weeks of her class she crammed 3 essays that were due on the last day of the course.
  • Lots of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning roughly 2016-2026 with consistent themes on care, workload, and composition structure.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A36 reviews
ENG1B10 reviews
1B1 review
1B471231 review
ENG1A1B1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG427081 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 4

B range

22

B+ 3 · B 18 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1