AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Wendy Micham

PSY41 · PSY1 · PSYCHOLOGY8 · PSY9 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH9 · PSY35 · PSY8 · PSYCH25 · PSY33 · PSYCH111 · GENPSY1 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
32.61%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Avoid unless you already write strong APA papers and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderOpen-book quizzesResearch paper killerCondescending toneExtra credit heavy
  • Older reviews often call the class an easy A with open-book quizzes and tons of .
  • Recent reviews heavily criticize rude or condescending interactions and .
  • You can pass if you follow the syllabus word-for-word, but many students say the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Open-book quizzes and can pad grades, but the .

Both formats show easy quiz paths; online and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is mostly textbook-based and , so intellectual challenge is moderate rather than advanced.

Course content feels easy in both formats; the paper and instructor tone create the real difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews say attendance is mandatory or that skipping will hurt, .

; online still often pressures live/zoom participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent comments repeatedly urge students to find another professor.

; recent online and in-person reviews are largely negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate and students report .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and one major research paper create steady work without always being overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload pattern is similar across formats; online adds email and Canvas friction.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some older praise for knowledge and inspiration is outweighed by widespread reports of condescension and book-reading lectures.

Format shift

In-person older cohorts are warmer; recent online and in-person experiences are much worse.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a heavily weighted APA research paper all matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between easy open-book eras and later complaints of , and .

Main concern

Research paper graded like an English class with .

What students said

“ !”
PSY-35
“Horrible professor. Gets off task with her students.”
PSY1
“She graded as though it was an English class with .”
PSYCHOLOGY8

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections frequently , and little empathy when students struggle.

Main concern

and unhelpful or belittling communication online.

What students said

“Sorry for your loss; the class has moved on and you can't make anything up”
PSY-35
“My citations were wrong in the paper so she gave me a zero.”
PSY1
“This class was a total nightmare!!!”
PSY1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many students report open-book quizzes and exams, but the and high-stakes.

Open book quizzesOpen book examsCanvas quizzesExtra creditResearch paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, with some notes that midterms or finals can still be closed book.

Open book quizzesOpen book examsTake-home quizzesStudy quizzes for exams
“ !”
PSY-35
“ canvas”
PSY33
“The midterm and but just study & SHOW UP TO CLASS ya dorks”
PSY1

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and papers on Canvas but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Canvas quizzesResearch paperExtra credit
“ .”
PSY1
“discussion posts and .”
PSYCHOLOGY8

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“FIND ANOTHER PROFESSOR! The , but the instructor lacks interpersonal skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (15 online, 35 in and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ ! Her lectures honestly make no sense most of the time she just rants about covd for 20 minutes before even getting to the lecture.”

📝

22/100

“My citations were wrong in the paper so she gave me a zero. Wouldn't even grade the other 7 pages I turned.”

📗

70/100

“This is the EASIEST A you can receive, however, her lectures are so arduously boring that I had to at home.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Professor Micham is a
  • She grades the research paper as if it were an English class
  • !

Theme 2

🗣️ About Communication

  • Most unprofessional and condescending instructor iver ever had.
  • Big lack of empathy.
  • she makes you feel incompetent.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload Style

  • Tons of
  • Get ready to read
  • discussion posts and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a : older easy-A praise versus recent toughness and interpersonal complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 511
1 out of 523

Course coverage

PSY118 reviews
PSY97 reviews
PSYCH16 reviews
PSY-355 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY84 reviews
Show 7 more courses
GENPSY12 reviews
PSY332 reviews
PSYCH92 reviews
PSY411 review
PSY81 review
PSYCH1111 review
PSYCH251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 8 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 4 · Not_Sure_Yet 1