AI Rate Professor

English

Jordan Hodges

ENG1A40016 · ENG1A · ENG1 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENGLISH1B · ENG46928 · ENG5044435 · ENG50 · ENG45188 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
97.62%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Must-take English professor if you will show up, do the readings, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious LecturerTough on EssaysGreat FeedbackNo TextbookDiscussion Heavy
  • Near-unanimous praise for .
  • but with , and effort is rewarded.
  • Attendance and participation matter; weekly readings and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Weekly work can be easy, but so an A needs solid writing effort and .

Online and while other work stays lighter.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Readings and discussions are manageable for college English, not brain-burning, but not content-free either.

and readings; online adds weekly boards and short papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and participation as required or grade-relevant, with skip-class warnings common.

In-person is clearly attendance-heavy; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Overwhelming majority call him one of the and and support.

; in-person sample is much larger.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

He is often labeled a tough essay grader who still rewards effort with , and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect and short responses plus a few major essays rather than constant busywork or exams.

Format shift

Online weekly boards can feel steady; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students consistently praise funny, engaging lectures, real-world connections, care, and .

Format shift

Quality is excellent across online and especially large in-person samples.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is almost entirely essays, weekly responses, discussions, and group work with little or no traditional testing.

Format shift

Both formats center writing and discussion over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are discussion-based, hilarious, and and essay-focused assessment.

Main concern

and required participation can surprise students seeking a free A.

What students said

“Hodges is astonishing as a professor. His syllabus is amazing and ”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG1B
“ but he gives you so much help before hand”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections use group discussion boards, weekly short writing, and a .

Main concern

and summer loads can feel heavier.

What students said

“ but .”
ENG1A
“he's .”
ENG1A
“ and genuinely wants to see you improve and succeed!”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses rarely use classic exams; success depends on essays and ongoing writing rather than locked-down tests.

No Traditional ExamsEssay HeavyWeekly ResponsesGroup Discussions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and two to four essays with almost no tests or quizzes.

Essays OnlyWeekly Reading ResponsesClass DiscussionExtra Credit
“There were 5 essays & no test/quizzes.”
ENG1A
“ and you get to watch clips on youtube occasionally in class”
ENG1B

Online

Online , and a few peer-reviewed essays; no webcam proctoring is clearly described.

Weekly Discussion BoardsFew EssaysPeer ReviewNo Textbook
“ and one 1-2 page paper to write a week, not hard at all.”
ENG1A
“There are only a few essays, and they're peer reviewed by your group before submission”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hodges is astonishing as a professor. His syllabus is amazing and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews (5 online, 43 in , and near-universal recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Absolutely loved taking this class! You can tell he really wants his students to be better writers.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“TAKE THIS COURSE. He is such a great professor, he will meet you halfway as long as you put effort and try.”

✍️

48/100

“ but he gives you so much help before hand answers any questions.”

😂 Class Energy

94/100

“He's super funny!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a very funny guy and makes the class enjoyable.
  • His lectures are super interesting and fun
  • he thinks outside the box

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but
  • not hard to get an A or B, by any means

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely wants to see you improve and succeed
  • very caring
  • approachable professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-eight detailed reviews spanning many years and courses show highly consistent praise for teaching with .

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A18 reviews
ENG1B11 reviews
ENG504443510 reviews
ENG503 reviews
ENG11 review
Show 5 more courses
ENG1A400161 review
ENG451881 review
ENG469281 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 3 · A 14

B range

14

B+ 6 · B 8

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2