AI Rate Professor

Languages

John Mark Sugars

CLASSICS101 · LATIN1 · CLSC201 · CLSC100 · LATINI · CLSC101 · GREEK1 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate disorganization and delayed grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture HeavyDisorganizedPop QuizzesNo Grades PostedKnowledgeable but Boring
  • Many students call lectures long, aimless, and .
  • Grades are often delayed or never posted, creating stress despite few graded items.
  • Content can be passable with notes and attendance, but recommendation rate is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some call it an easy A with notes and attendance, but , and opaque scores make an A uncertain.

All evidence is in person; outcomes range from easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Intro classics can feel straightforward if , but heavy lectures and .

In-person only; language classes add more material intensity for some students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as and lecture-based tests effectively punish absences.

In-person reviews warn that missing class hurts .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and repeated disorganization or grade-opacity complaints outweigh older praise for knowledge and humor.

Only in-person reviews exist; recent classics feedback is more negative than older language praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students call him a and little grade transparency.

Format shift

In-person only; tough-grader and delayed-grade themes dominate recent reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Few major assignments, but , and high-weight pop quizzes keep effort real.

Format shift

In-person classes often graded by few things .

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes funny or caring, but disorganization, boring delivery, and weak course systems hurt the experience.

Format shift

classics frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pop quizzes, lecture-based tests, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence centers on quizzes and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classics and language and sparse grade transparency.

Main concern

Missing grade posts, confusing materials, and .

What students said

“ grades at all”
CLSC100
“ ! Has not entered any of my grades”
CLSC101
“if you attend class and !”
CLSC100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard in-person quiz and test risk with lecture dependence; .

Pop QuizzesLecture-Based TestsFew Graded ItemsFinal Exam or Essay

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes can weigh heavily and tests track lectures and readings; grades are often posted late or not at all.

Pop QuizzesLecture-Based TestsDelayed GradesHeavy Reading
“He will give pop quizzes that are worth 40% of your grade.”
CLSC100
“ , and things that were reviewed.”
GREEK1
“Only gives around 4 quizzes during the semester.”
CLSC101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ grades at all”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews with no , and mixed knowledge praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“just talks aimlessly during lectures, notes are almost impossible to take bc half of what he says is irrelevant”

👎 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ !”

📋 Organization Issues

25/100

“he barely sent out grades like within the week of finals.”

📚 Content Knowledge

70/100

“Great professor, knows his stuff!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • VERY lecture heavy
  • his boring lectures made it hard to pay attention
  • passionate about the subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you attend class and
  • doesn't post any grades at all

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Logistics

  • Book is not very useful and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews over many years show recurring disorganization and quiz themes, but older language reviews soften the picture.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CLSC1004 reviews
CLSC1013 reviews
GREEK13 reviews
LATIN12 reviews
CLASSICS1011 review
Show 2 more courses
CLSC2011 review
LATINI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2