AI Rate Professor

English

Ivan Rios

ENG1A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Switch out if possible; this ENG1A experience is widely described as chaotic and grade-risky.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedTough graderSlow feedbackHarsh essaysAvoid
  • Nearly all reviews rate him 1 with
  • Students report missing due dates, wrong syllabus format, and grade weight changes
  • despite heavy writing load

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and many F, D, or drop outcomes make an A feel unreliable.

Both online and and failed or low outcomes more than fair A paths.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content itself is not advanced, but , and poor teaching make the course feel hard to navigate.

In-person students stress chaos and off-topic lectures; online students stress reading load and broken assignment systems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others do not, and reports conflict on whether class is truly in person or online.

A ; most online reviews mark it optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students repeatedly call him the and urge others to switch immediately.

and in-person ENG1A reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and some students say revisions keep the same grade.

Format shift

; one online review also reports late grade-percentage changes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and group-style tasks pile up with .

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress so many papers; .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students cite absenteeism, AI-like feedback, wrong syllabus details, and lectures that .

Format shift

In-person reviews focus on no-shows and rants; and unproofed assignments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades revolve around essays and deciding most outcomes.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections also draw extreme criticism for , and disorganized instructions.

Main concern

Students say he may not show up, grades months late, and confuses course format or assignment requirements.

What students said

“I would show up everyday to class just for him to not be there. I would also turn in all my assignments just for him to grade it 2 months later.”
ENG1A
“His syllabus was all wrong saying it was in person I go on to campus turns out its was all online”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG1A is marked by harsh essay , and several F or .

Main concern

Assignment dates and grade percentages may change late, and .

What students said

“Was at a C the entire semester then he changed grade percentages when grades were due and I ended up failing with an F.”
ENG1A
“He's very unreasonable and . And whenever you try to correct your paper he gives you the same grade-”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove traditional exams; the main risk is harsh, slow, and .

Essay-heavy assessmentVague feedbackHarsh paper gradingNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and harsh essay scores, not a clearly described exam policy.

Harsh essay scoringLate gradingDisorganized assignments
“he is a and gave me low scores for most of my essays”
ENG1A
“ and he had assignments from Two years ago saying it was missing .”
ENG1A

Online

Online evidence centers on writing assignments, required sources, and late or .

Essay-heavyRequired professor sourcesVague feedback
“The , and some of and didn't quite help.”
ENG1A
“We were also required to use his provided sources on the essays, but his sources were pretty bad”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I suggest to the people who have him to immedietly switch out. He was one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 ENG1A reviews split evenly online and in person, with High credibility from consistent negative detail.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“ . and forgets his own instructions for assignments.”

⚖️

15/100

“The , and some of and didn't quite help.”

🗂️ Chaos Risk

10/100

“ . Grading was 80% on Writing Assignments and 20% Homework”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“This is by far the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are offtopic and spends most of his time just ranting about social issues
  • I would show up everyday to class just for him to not be there.
  • for an English professor, .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I ended up failing with an F. Terrible.
  • he is a and gave me low scores for most of my essays
  • whenever you try to correct your paper he gives you the same grade-

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • I don't think he knows how to work the .
  • His syllabus was all wrong saying it was in person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent detailed reviews from 2022-2026 are highly consistent on disorganization and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2