AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Steven Moreno-Terrill

Courses not reported · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take him if you can self-manage heavy online writing and ; many students say .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely slow gradingPolarizing experienceHeavy weekly writingAccepts late workOnline syllabus chaos
  • Reviews are sharply split between caring flexible professor and .
  • Online sections draw the harshest complaints about messy syllabi, heavy weekly writing, and month-long grade delays.
  • Some students report easy courses with and late-work acceptance, while others report Fs and withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some sections feel easy if you submit the work, but many students report , and no .

Online is more split between easy late-work paths and failing outcomes; in-person sample is tiny and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Readings and short writings can feel manageable, but volume and organization problems raise the real difficulty.

Positive online reviews call content easy; negative online reviews call the weekly load excessive.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance is listed as optional in some sections and .

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

About 40 percent would take again, and recent online reviews .

In-person opinions conflict; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

He accepts late work and can feel understanding, but tough-grader tags, no , and failing grades pull leniency down.

Format shift

Online is the main source of both late-work praise and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Multiple , and constant short essays or papers.

Format shift

Workload complaints are concentrated in online sections.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A minority find him caring and organized, but , and poor student support.

Format shift

Online reviews drive the negative average; in-person evidence is too thin and conflicting.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Courses revolve , and papers more than traditional timed exams.

Format shift

Some online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Only two in-person reviews exist and they conflict: one calls him the best teacher ever, the because of and heavy work.

Main concern

Tiny sample and .

What students said

“Bro this guy is genuinely the class and he's legit the best teacher ive ever had.”
42199
“ ! Takes forever to grade. Do not waster your time, value, and money! .”
44055

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

supporters praise late-work flexibility and manageable readings, while many others report syllabus chaos, 6 assignments a week, and grading delays of 4 to 6 weeks.

Main concern

, and heavy weekly writing are the dominant risks.

What students said

“There is !! .”
42199
“ .”
47029
“Every week you will get 6 assignments to complete. 3 discussions and 3 short paragraph essays.”
47029

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans assignment-based and , but and heavy writing undercut friendliness.

No final exam in some online sectionsLate work acceptedDiscussion postsShort paragraph essaysNo clear proctoring tools mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

beyond heavy papers and slow grading.

Lots of papersSlow grading
“ ! Takes forever to grade.”
44055
“accepts late work with no penalty”
42199

Online

Online evidence supports assignment-heavy evaluation, late-work acceptance, and in at ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

No final exam or essay (some sections)Late work accepted3 discussions and 3 short essays weeklySlow grade returns
“There are . There is !!”
42199
“Professor Terrill accepts late work throughout the entire semester”
44055
“it will take him about 1 month to grade the assignments”
47029

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are taking this online, choose a different teacher or . Not worth it & do not recommend at all!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 , and online workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🐢

20/100

“ . I would never take him ever again.”

❤️ Late Work Flexibility

75/100

“Professor Terrill accepts late work throughout the entire semester and you can tell by the comments that he really cares about his students”

📚 Assignment Flood

18/100

“Every week you will get 6 assignments to complete.”

🔀 Polarized Outcomes

36/100

“Bro this guy is genuinely the goat”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is not present and doesn't grade in a timely manner.
  • , and he is very communicative
  • he's passionate about the subject, but not his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is easy as long as .
  • Too much unnecessary work. .
  • No and grades really slow.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Organization

  • Course does not follow what his syllabus said.
  • The syllabus is messy & does not follow the due dates for the course.
  • Does not say when .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews with strong detail show a clear polarization pattern, especially online, but the .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

470295 reviews
421993 reviews
440552 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1