AI Rate Professor

Communication

Marian Carrol

COMCOM · COM140437 · COM1 · COMM102 · COM145549 · COMM9 · COMMST100 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other speech option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderVague InstructionsHarsh FeedbackMandatory AttendanceSpeech Heavy
  • , and inconsistent with vague assignment rules.
  • Many report D/F/drop outcomes and .
  • A and if you put in heavy effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Grades skew low with frequent D/F/drop reports and .

Both online and ; online adds zero late-work mercy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Public speaking content is manageable for some, but , and harsh standards make the course feel very hard.

Difficulty is high in both and workload than pure lecture content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and missing class can tank your standing or require a doctor's note.

; online notes are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Roughly one in , and the dominant advice is to never enroll for GPA and stress reasons.

Recommendation is low in both formats, with only rare positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; students say and unstated rules.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Speeches, outlines, papers, and participation pile up and require long preparation hours.

Format shift

Workload complaints appear across formats, with papers and speeches most often cited.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students mostly , and poor communication.

Format shift

In-person negatives dominate volume; online is also strongly negative with one glowing outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade centers on speeches, outlines, papers, and participation more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews dominate and heavily criticize , and class attrition.

Main concern

Strict speech guidelines with the outline.

What students said

“For the sake of your gpa and mental stability, .”
COM1
“ and gives you F's on every single assignment for not following her guidelines, yet even if you follow her !”
COM1
“Her instructions for assignments are extremely vague and were never stated in her instructions.”
COM145549

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students largely report zero late-work flexibility, little feedback, defensive responses, and .

Main concern

Random early deadlines, no partial credit for late work, and weak communication online.

What students said

“Run the other way! B to F in a week.”
COM1
“ .”
COM1
“I dropped her class. feedback she would just give me a 0.”
COM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly speeches and papers; a few older reviews note open-book quizzes, not strict digital proctoring.

Open Book QuizzesSpeech AssignmentsOutline Based Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize speech guidelines and proctoring.

Speech OutlinesOpen Book QuizzesParticipation
“ . She offers for dressing up.”
COM1
“ , so get the book.”
COM1

Online

Online reviews focus on speech deadlines and zero-tolerance late policies rather than proctored exams.

Speech DeadlinesNo Late CreditFeedback Issues
“Makes random speech deadlines 9AM when all the rest were 11:59 Not even for partial credit, zero exceptions for late work.”
COM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For the sake of your gpa and mental stability, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (4 online, 18 in , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

20/100

“This professor is the . Her instructions are not specific, and when I would talk to her about it, she was not professional and would give attitude when answering my questions.”

⚖️

12/100

“ and gives you F's on every single assignment for not following her guidelines, yet even if you follow her !”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ class and in the last weeks ended with only 6 other students.”

📝 Workload Load

28/100

“Don't forget to put 100% effort into the outlines or you will get a 0 in that.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • instructions are not specific
  • terrible at explaining things and gets frustrated when you ask quetions
  • Seemed like they didnt know what they were doing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got an A on the final but somehow ended up failing
  • I had to bust my butt in that class to get a C

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication & Tone

  • I personally find her rude, overcritical, and very stubborn
  • when you ask for clarification/details she gets defensive
  • Never responded to any of my messages

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews spanning 2012-2024 with and detailed grade outcomes support a reliable negative picture.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

COM114 reviews
COM1404372 reviews
COMM92 reviews
COM1455491 review
COMCOM1 review
Show 2 more courses
COMM1021 review
COMMST1001 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

5

D+ 2 · D 3

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1