AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Wendy McKeen

CHEM12A · CHE1A · CHEM1A · 1A · CHE2A · CHE12A · CHEM1B · CHE12B · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Strong pick for chemistry if you will put in and use her and office help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditHilariousCaringClear Grading CriteriaLots of Homework
  • Most students praise humor, care, accessibility, and that improves outcomes.
  • Chemistry is still hard; success usually , and not falling behind.
  • Labs and some advanced sections .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many call it doable or even easy A with serious practice and , but .

Online often open notes with heavy work; in-person stresses practice and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Intro chem can feel manageable with her support, while ochem and weak prep make content feel hard.

Recent intro and hybrid comments .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Many list attendance mandatory or warn skipping hurts, but some online and .

Online more often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and recent comments are strongly positive about care and structure.

Both formats mostly recommend her when students keep up with homework.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Partial credit on exams, curves, and plentiful .

Format shift

Online mentions open notes; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and occasional group work create a moderate-to-heavy but structured load.

Format shift

Online reviews .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Frequently described as , and available outside class despite some self-teach complaints.

Format shift

In-person praise is broader; online is mixed but still mostly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals all matter; and practice materials support success.

Format shift

Online adds discussions and learning activities; and mini exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and helpful; exams manageable with practice, though labs and pacing can feel harsh for weaker prep.

Main concern

Fast pace and lab strictness can sink underprepared students.

What students said

“She's a great professor. but .”
CHEM1B
“Easy A if you're serious.”
Che-2A
“ and she gives you all the material needed to know what's on the test”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections offer and sometimes open-note tests, but and self-learning stress, especially in ochem.

Main concern

High online work volume and self-teaching for harder courses.

What students said

“Her online course does have a lot of work... so be prepared for that.”
1A
“ but they were open notes. She offers a lot of ”
CHEM1A
“Most of this class was self-learning.”
CHE12A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and sometimes open notes online rather than strict lockdown proctoring.

Partial CreditExtra CreditOpen Notes OnlineMini ExamsMultiple Choice Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice materials; labs graded harder than lecture tests.

Partial CreditPractice TestsMini ExamsHarder Lab Grading
“The . She gives you partial credit.”
Che-2A
“she grades the !”
CHEM1B
“the .”
CHEM1A

Online

Online reviews describe difficult but ; no clear Lockdown Browser claims.

Open NotesExtra CreditWeekly Homework
“ but they were open notes.”
CHEM1A
“The work helps you in , and she gives a lot of opportunities.”
1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Mini exam (5 total) format, not 3 big exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting teaching, , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and actually cares about the material.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ .”

🎁 Edge

80/100

“ !! make sure to attend those sgls from the beginning!”

⚖️ Effort for Reward

62/100

“I would not say this is an easy A class but it is doable with the effort put in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's funny and easy to understand and caring.
  • She makes lecture be more comfortable because she likes to joke around.
  • She goes through everything in great detail

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • this is an easy A
  • Not an easy A but definitely doable
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs and Workload

  • she grades the !
  • Her online course does have a lot of work
  • and there is a lot of it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven detailed reviews from 2018-2026 across intro and ochem give strong, somewhat mixed but coherent evidence.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM1A6 reviews
Che-2A4 reviews
CHE1A4 reviews
CHEM1B4 reviews
CHE12A3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CHEM12A3 reviews
CHE12B2 reviews
1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1