AI Rate Professor

English

Michaelsun Knapp

ENG1A · ENG1B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want real writing practice and if you want a light English ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkGet ready to readGives good feedbackLecture heavyAccommodating with deadlines
  • and many papers; success requires staying on topic and meeting word counts.
  • and will extend deadlines if you communicate.
  • and lectures run long; not an easy-pass class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Most reported A grades, but , and staying on topic; slackers fail.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content centers on dense theory themes with lots of books, poetry, and papers, so the material itself is demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most students report and that missing class hurts participation and success.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

58/100

About 60 percent would take again; learners praise growth and and workload.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and ; A is reachable if work is complete and on-topic, not free.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and tags for lots of homework dominate student comments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Students highlight useful feedback and accommodation, though some find lectures too long and hard to track.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and papers with few tests; as an in-class essay.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG1A/1B with , and if you talk to him.

Main concern

High reading and time-heavy.

What students said

“You'll read, a lot; ; and you will need to be in class, participating, a lot.”
ENG1B
“If you want an . If !”
ENG1B
“He gives good, personal feedback on essays in a one-on-one session during class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-driven; the .

In-class essay finalFew formal testsPaper-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers; one student notes the final was an in-class essay.

In-class essay finalFew testsPaper workshops
“ .”
ENG1A
“Tests? Not many”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an . If !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Heavy Writing Load

28/100

“You'll read, a lot; ; and you will need to be in class, participating, a lot.”

💬

64/100

“He gives good, personal feedback on essays in a one-on-one session during class.”

🙋 Accommodating If You Talk

70/100

“He'll move due-dates, he's VERY accomadating, just TALK TO HIM (OR E-MAIL).”

📚 Not An Easy Pass

58/100

“Very difficult class for me, you definitely have to work for your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were very very long.
  • He gave his last few Fridays (personal time, all day) to help students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You'll only fail if you don't turn in anything or if you're off-topic/undershoot the word-count.
  • If you want an .
  • and does count.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • So many papers
  • 7 books are required (1 text 6 poetry).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews spanning 2018-2024 show consistent workload themes but a small sample and mixed recs.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1B3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values