AI Rate Professor

English

D Kruizenga-Muro

ENG4 · ENG50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid teacher for serious writers, but expect and do not bank on easy hire outcomes from tutor training.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackPop quizzesEngaging stories
  • Often called a good or delightful professor with and eloquent lectures.
  • and tough; recent students warn to prepare carefully.
  • Tutor-training ENG4 functions partly as a hiring filter and can disappoint job seekers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Tough and ; easy A is not the vibe.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Essays and reading are common, topics can be easy, but tutor training and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; otherwise not clearly flexible.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; older students praise fun learning while .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tagged as a and described as nitpicky despite otherwise positive teaching comments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Textbook chapters, quizzes, essays, and workshops create a steady but not extreme load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students call her cool, delightful, and helpful with workshops and detailed storytelling.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of essays, textbook quizzes, pop quizzes, and performance-based tutor training evaluation.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and tutor-training classes with , and .

Main concern

Tough or and uncertain hire outcomes in tutor-training sections.

What students said

“She's a great professor but is very nit picky with grades and is very picky with tutoring styles”
ENG4
“Interesting content and a delightful Professor!”
ENG4
“Cool fun teacher, learned alot. Lots of essays but easy topics. .”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and essays appear standard; .

Pop quizzesTextbook quizzes next dayEssay-focused work

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students mention pop quizzes and .

Pop quizzesNext-day textbook quizzesEssays
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG4
“gives you chapters to read from the textbook for hw and .”
ENG50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a great professor but is very nit picky with grades”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting grading strictness and teaching warmth. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

34/100

“She's a great professor but is very nit picky with grades and is very picky with tutoring styles”

🌟 Enjoyable Teaching

72/100

“Interesting content and a delightful Professor!”

📝 Essay Workload

50/100

“Lots of essays but easy topics. .”

🎯 Tutor Training Caution

40/100

“This class is to get student tutors to work for free.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cool fun teacher, learned alot.
  • One could get lost in her stories because of the great detail she puts into it.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very nit picky with grades
  • Just be prepared!!!!!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Tutor Training

  • The entire course is a lengthy interview process.
  • They didn't hire anyone from my 6 person class.
  • You'll never be a paid employee at the WRC as a tutor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews with mixed eras (2008-2024) and sparse grade data; but sample is thin.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG43 reviews
ENG502 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1