AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Myong-Sook Kim

MATH5 · TOM3010 · MATH12 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself; recent students strongly warn against her MATH-12 sections.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRushed LecturesLots of HomeworkConfusing ExplanationsTough MathPolarizing
  • Most recent MATH-12 reviews say , and does not ensure students learn.
  • Students report and .
  • One stats review found her fun and funny despite hard content, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades and comments show heavy struggle; and confusion make an A .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Math content is hard and the .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance is listed as .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students say non-MATH-12 contexts.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tags and and poor outcomes for many students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and dense modules packed into single sessions.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students say she rushes, confuses herself, and prioritizes covering units over learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and papers dominate the described workload.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students mostly , and weak explanations, with only a couple milder or positive notes.

Main concern

Pace is too fast and .

What students said

“Whether we learn or not, she does not care. I have never seen a teacher or professor go through one module with more than 5 new formulas and 10 exercises + lecture in a single class session.”
MATH-12
“Worst math professor ever. Professor makes confusing work sheets that she ”
MATH5
“this professor's shining personality made the class much less painful than it could've been.”
MATH5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; the main issue is that practice does not prepare students for graded work.

Heavy homework alignment issuesConfusing worksheets

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on confusing worksheets and a .

Confusing worksheetsHomework-heavyPractice not aligned
“practice and review do not show you how to properly do homework questions or understand how to/when to use each equation.”
MATH5
“I did not learn anything nor get good grades.”
MATH-12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, weighted toward recent MATH-12 complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“SHE is the ”

📚 Workload and Pace

22/100

“go through one module with more than 5 new formulas and 10 exercises + lecture in a single class session.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

😄 Rare Positive Note

70/100

“ , enjoyable class with lots of laughs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • All she cares about is finishing the units

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I did not learn anything nor get good grades.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Prof was chill.
  • this professor's shining personality made the class much less painful
  • she does not care at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews with mixed courses; recent MATH-12 cluster is consistent but overall sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH-123 reviews
MATH52 reviews
TOM30101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1